Central Information Commission Judgements

Shri. Dhanraj Pal vs Staff Selection Commission on 23 March, 2011

Central Information Commission
Shri. Dhanraj Pal vs Staff Selection Commission on 23 March, 2011
                                     ds U nz h ; l wp uk vk;ks x
                                    Central Information Commission
                                    2 ry] foxa 'c' / 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing
                                vxLr ØkfUr Hkou / August Kranti Bhavan
                                   Hkhdkth dkek Iysl/ Bhikaji Cama Place
                               ubZ fnYyh ­ 110066 / New Delhi - 110066
                                                  Phone No.011­26183996
                                                      *****


                                                                          No.CIC/SM/C/2011/000384
                                                                                                           
                                                                                   Dated: 23 March 2011


 Name of the Complainant                      :      Shri Dhanraj Pal
                                                     Qtr. No. M­23, Store Colony,
                                                     Amradandi Post, Alai Colori,
                                                     Distt - Shahdol, M.P - 484 116.


 Name of the Public Authority                 :      The Appellate Authority 
                                                     Staff Selection Commission,
                                                     Block - 12, CGO Complex,
                                                     Lodhi Road, New Delhi ­ 110 003.


                                                  ORDER

Shri   Dhanraj  Pal  of   Madhya  Pradesh  has  complained  to   the   Central 

Information Commission that he received no reply/information from the Central 

Public   Information   Officer   although   he   had   filed   his   RTI­application   on   16 

September 2010.   A copy each of the RTI­application and the complaint are 

enclosed for ready reference. 

2. It is noted that the Complainant did not have an opportunity to go to the 

Appellate   Authority   and   has   directly   approached   the   Commission   with   his 

complaint.   In exercise of powers vested under Section 18(1) of the Right to 

Information   (RTI)   Act,   we   direct   the   Appellate   Authority   to   enquire   into   the 
allegations made by the Complainant and after giving him an opportunity of 

hearing, to pass an appropriate order with a view to ensuring that the desired 

information is provided to the Complainant without any further loss of time.

3. We also direct the Appellate Authority to obtain the explanation of the 

CPIO in writing for not providing the information in time and to forward the same 

to us along with his comments before 25 April 2011.   We will decide on the 

imposition of penalty on the CPIO in terms of Section 20(1) of the  Right to 

Information (RTI) Act thereafter.    

4. In case the Complainant is not satisfied with the orders of the Appellate 

Authority, he is free to approach this Commission again in second appeal.

5. The Commission ordered accordingly.

(Satyananda Mishra)
Chief Information Commissioner

Authenticated true copy.  Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against 
application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this 
Commission.

(Vijay Bhalla)
Deputy Registrar