IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RPFC.No. 289 of 2007()
1. SAIDALAVI KOKKADAN, S/O.MOIDEENKUTTY,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. VALAPPIL SAMEERA, D/O.SAID ALAVI,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.BINDU SREEKUMAR
For Respondent :SRI.DILIP MOHAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN
Dated :11/01/2010
O R D E R
M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
...........................................
R.P.(F.C.)No.289 OF 2007
&
R.P.(F.C.)No.290 OF 2007
.............................................
Dated this the 11th day of January, 2010
O R D E R
These revisions are preferred against the order in
CMP.Nos.1412/2007 and 1413/2007 in M.C.No.340/2003 of
the Family Court, Malappuram. C.M.P.No.1412/2007 is a
petition filed to condone the delay in filing the application
for setting aside the ex parte order and the other petition is
filed to set aside the ex parte order.
2. On account of the absence of the petitioner both the
applications were dismissed. It is against that the present
revisions are preferred. I feel an opportunity has to be given
to the petitioner herein to put forward his case regarding
condonation of delay as well as for setting aside the ex
parte order.
Therefore I allow these revisions petitions and set aside
the order of the Family Court dismissing C.M.P.Nos.1412
and 1413/2007. The Family Court is directed to restore
C.M.P.Nos.1412 and 1413/2007 and then dispose of the same
in accordance with law after giving opportunity to both the
: 2 :
R.P.(F.C.)No.289 OF 2007
&
R.P.(F.C.)No.290 OF 2007
parties to put forward their contentions. The parties are
directed to appear before the Family Court on 20.02.2010.
In case the wife does not appear on that day, the revision
petitioner herein is directed to take notice to her so that
the matter can be heard and disposed of in her presence. It
is also stated that let the petitions be disposed of within a
period of six weeks from the date of the first appearance of
the parties.
M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE
cl
: 3 :
R.P.(F.C.)No.289 OF 2007
&
R.P.(F.C.)No.290 OF 2007
R.P.