High Court Karnataka High Court

Subedar Lingappa Since Dead By His … vs Lingappa on 23 July, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Subedar Lingappa Since Dead By His … vs Lingappa on 23 July, 2008
Author: V.G.Sabhahit & Swamy
.g>fgR1.cA§GAEHaHAIAH,

EN THE HIG§ COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALOEEIT
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY 0? JULY 2oo§  *f; a
PRESENT ui v  u«'
THE HON'BL£ an. JUSTICE JV:q.sA$HaHii *

THE HON’BLE MR. JUsT1cg_ L.fiAfiA¥ANAjSw§QY’

RSA No.358 oF’2§e5 c/fi».’-
RFA No.IG42 of 2QDB ‘

IV”

nu RSA NO.358/2005

SUBEDAR LINGAP§A ._;
SINCE DEAD By 313 LES _

a} SRI.NINGAPFA, _. veV, z%’,V*, ..
SON OF LAIE.sUBEDAR.£1sGaP?A’_
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,’ , 3R1}c§£::ALiH§Af33}g
._ son or £ATE”3UBED$R”LINGAPPA,
1:y§§ED ABOUT 58 Yfigfis,

4SG¥”QFnL$TE SUBEDAR LINGAPPA,
*AEEDqEBO3§,49 YEARS,

d)

e)

f)

I}

‘fsgi.g;n;3£1iAPPA,

SRI.BETTAPPA,
S/0.SUBEDAR LINGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,

ALL ARE RESIDING AT BEEADI VILLAGE,
BIDADI 303;: _m~_
RAMANAGARAH TALUK :
BANGALORE RURAL 33313151

SMT.LINGAMMA, * fl
DAUGHTER OF LATE SUBEDAR LIHGA?PA,”g
WIFE OF PUTTASWAMAIH, 1:
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, _

RESEBING AT BIDADI VILLAG£;*5 ‘g
BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARAM TALUK}_ {*
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. T’ >.T’

SMT.HONAMMA, ;*’;_* 3 g v* V ‘.’.w;
DAUGHTER OF LA¥E_sgBspAR~LiNuAPPA,3.

WIFE or SHIVANNA; ja ~=; a;,’=_”_’

AGED ABOUT 39 YEAgs;_g ‘,*z;a'”” ;
RESIDING AT xoLL§GauAHnLLI«v:LLAGE$H4
HARGHALLI HQBLI, *A;_ j _’»u .
KANAKAPURA T&LUK, v’w aaW a_v

BANGALORE RURAL DISTBIGY\: ‘V

….APPELLANT(S)

{By Sriyuthé; ?.u.si9Q$§AL:APPA,
p.g:G09z,.AavggAIEs FOR MYLARAIAB

ASSQQIATES}

sh;.L1NGAFFA,”.

“SG§”aFVMALLEN£EGAP?A.

Aggy ABOUT_?5 YEARS,

3}

4)

5)

6)

7)

8}

.9;

SON OF MALLENINGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.

SRI.M.SHIVANNA.

SQN SF MALLENINGAPPA.
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS.

SHI.GANGADHARAIAH Q GAVIAPPA,
SON OF MALLENINGAPPA,
AGEB ABOUT 56 YEARS.

SRI.B.M.MARISHAEAIAH,
SON DP MALLENINGAPPA,
AGEB ABQUT 48 YEARS,

SRI.B-C.PUTTASWAfiAIA$; £3 :~5
son OF LATE c3IKKA;1§GA1AH,
AGED 530$? 65iYEARS;”%_b”fv v

sR1.B.c.MA§ié§Ag§1AH3S’_Sx°

SGR 0? LAEE cHIKKaL;NsAiA”,_~?
AGED ABOUT 58 ¥EAas;x.V<.*- ,

SRI.B.GAfiGADHAfi£,T'-S
sex 0? LATE BETTAPPA. V
5GED_AgQUT,4$ ¥EARs;~ ———- ~

skilcfixxfiafirxcéiafi e GUNDAPPA,
soy GE LATE BETTAPPA,

SVVVAGEB aagur 45'a§ARs,

'~7a;L ARE Rfigibxwe AT BANAHDUB VILLAGE.

_B§D&Di<HOBLI, RAMANAGARAH TALUK,

3_sAnegLgRE RURAL BISTRICT

N Sfl%Qgx

IfiS'K§RNATAKA INDUSTRISL AREA

1)

2)

3)

4}

QEVELOPMENT BOARD,
V.I.T.C. BUILDIRG.

1ST FLOOR, NEAR MUSEUH,
KASTURBA ROAD.

BANGALORE -560 801

REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN

P’

SPO RFA NO.I042/2900

saI.B.c.PUITAswAMAI5H,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS; _-

SRI.B.C.MARISWAfi¥,fl_j
AGED ABOUT 53m¥BARS,”%,,
NO.1 & 2 ARE sows OF V;
CBIKKALENGAIAH,– “~V’

B.GANGADHARAIA§g M_ .
AGED ABOUT 43 YEAR$.x.5

cfiiKfiAL1§GA1§H é~§UNDA§§A
RESI§E§T*0F»_BAfiAfiEUR VELLAGE
BIDADZ aastxg. – ~ ‘

a«,RAMANAaARAa’?gLygf;”

i}

A§D:,

“SQQEHAR LI§GA?PA,

é”SfG CHIKKALINGAIAH,

..; R£$§q3b£Nt(é)y; “[_

…AFPELLANT(S)

_'{B¥_s§:,:§;sH1vAPRAKAsH, ADVGCATE)

0-8”

and Decree dated: 26.10.2064 passed in

RA No.1/2801 on the file of the Pri.District & ~iwi*i

Sessiens Judge, Bangaiore Rural District,

Bangalore, dismissing the appeal and confi?mifigvVi

the judgement and decree dated: 3it10H2fiDG:*’

passed in 0S.NO.141/1997 on the r1ie_¢;ntnei;A”-= “K

Civil Judge {Sr.Dn.), Ramanagfirfim,
AS PER RFA N0.1042/2006 1′

____________…_.–.._____—._

RFA filed U/S.96 of C?c ggg}§s£’£n§*,
Judgment and Decee.iated 3i+i9[2Q§D figsééd in
O.S.N0.8/97 on thé iii: fir fihé Cifiii image

(Sr.Dn.) and JfiFC{},§§@a§ifiafami

This SA clw BEA is cgming cm for admission,

this day, theVCsurtifiééeitfiéefellowingr

» Segond’3c§§4Qf the appeal memo and

annekurég. t§7beuiiied within two weeks,

~47…

failing which, the appeals shall stand dismissed W 7

for nonmprosecution without any further order

from the Ceurt.

“M_’ gmm Cmnt:fl’Kaunumu