High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Balbir Singh And Another vs Baldev Singh & Others on 30 July, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Balbir Singh And Another vs Baldev Singh & Others on 30 July, 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

                                       FAO No.5470 of 2006(O&M)
                                       Date of decision: 30.7.2009

Balbir Singh and another                          ......Appellants(s)
                               Versus

Baldev Singh & others                             ......Respondent(s)

CORAM:- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR GARG

* * *

Present: Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Paul S. Saini, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.(Oral)

CM No.25486-CII of 2006

For the reasons mentioned in the application which remained

unrebutted, delay of 269 days in filing this appeal is condoned .

CM stands disposed of.

FAO No.5470 of 2006

By way of this appeal, the appellants have challenged the

impugned award passed by the Tribunal dated 23.11.2005 on the ground

of inadequacy of compensation whereby their claim petition for grant of

compensation on account of death of Jaspal Singh on 20.12.1999 in a

motor vehicular accident caused by respondent No.1 due to rash and

negligent driving of truck No. HR-45-5192, was allowed holding that the

claimant-appellants had already been awarded Rs.2,92,000/- as

compensation on account of death of Jaspal Singh in the aforesaid motor

vehicle accident by a judgment dated 11.12.2002 passed by Shri J S

Jhangra the then MACT, Karnal .

The brief facts of the case which are necessary for the

disposal of this appeal are that Jaspal Singh, son of the appellants, died on

20.12.1999 in an accident which was caused by respondent No.1 due to

rash and negligent driving of truck No. HR-45-5192.
FAO No.5470 of 2006(O&M) -2-

Gurmeet Kaur, widow of the deceased Jaspal Singh, filed a

claim petition claiming compensation on account of death of Jaspal Singh

in the said motor vehicular accident. The appellants were not party to the

aforesaid claim petition.

Shri J. S. Jhangra, the then MACT, Karnal vide his judgment

dated 11.12.2002, copy of which was placed on record of this case, has

held that the death of Jaspal Singh was caused on account of rash and

negligent driving of truck No.HR-45-5192 by respondent No.1. The

Tribunal assessed the compensation at Rs.7,30,000/- payable on account

of death of aforesaid Jaspal Singh and ordered to pay an amount of

Rs.4,38,000/- to Gurmeet Kaur, widow of the deceased, observing that the

remaining amount of compensation i.e Rs.2,92,000/- shall go to the

parents of the deceased (appellants) who were not impleaded as claimants

in that claim petition. It may be pointed out that the rights of the appellants

qua compensation to the tune of Rs.2,92,000/- already stood determined in

the previous award Ex.P-1. The aforesaid award has already become final

and even the appellants have not challenged the same.

While passing the impugned award, the Tribunal granted

interest @ 6% per annum from the date of the claim petition till its

realization on the amount of Rs.2,92,000/- to the appellants. There is no

other evidence on record on the basis of which the compensation can be

enhanced in favour of the appellants.

Thus, I find no merit in this petition.

Dismissed.

July 30, 2009                                (RAKESH KUMAR GARG)
ps                                                   JUDGE