Gujarat High Court High Court

Gujarat vs Assistant on 25 August, 2008

Gujarat High Court
Gujarat vs Assistant on 25 August, 2008
Author: K.A.Puj,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice Bankim.N.Mehta,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/29792/2007	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 29792 of 2007
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

GUJARAT
POWER CORPORATION LTD - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

ASSISTANT
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TEX - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MRS
SWATI SOPARKAR for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE BANKIM.N.MEHTA
		
	

 

				Date
: 25/08/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ)

1. Heard
Mr. S.N. Soparkar, learned Senior Counsel with learned advocate Mr.
Tushar Hemani for the petitioner and Mr. Manish R. Bhatt learned Sr.
Counsel instructed on Mrs. Mauna M. Bhatt for the respondent ?
Revenue.

2. At
the time of issuance of the notice by this court on 7-12-2007, this
Court has permitted the Assessing Officer to continue with the
assessment proceedings and if necessary, also to pass final order but
that shall not be given effect till further order.

3. The
assessment order is duly served upon the petitioner and the
petitioner has also filed an appeal against the said order before the
Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The petitioner is, therefore,
directed to file copy of the assessment order and appeal memo on the
record of this petition.

4. Having
heard the learned counsels for the respective parties, we are of the
view that the matter requires consideration by this Court and hence
this petition is admitted and Rule is made returnable on 4th
September, 2008.

5. Mr.

M.R. Bhatt, learned Senior Standing Counsel waives service of notice
of Rule on behalf of the revenue. Demand raised by the Assessing
Officer as a result of the assessment order is stayed during the
pendency of the petition.

(K.A.

Puj, J.)

(Bankim
N. Mehta, J.)

/JVSatwara/

   

Top