High Court Kerala High Court

Manoj.C.J vs Commercial Tax Officer on 15 April, 2009

Kerala High Court
Manoj.C.J vs Commercial Tax Officer on 15 April, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 11994 of 2009(T)


1. MANOJ.C.J, AGED - 38,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER
                       ...       Respondent

2. COMMERCIAL TAXES FAST TRACK

3. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES

4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.K.SREEJITH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :15/04/2009

 O R D E R
                       S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
                 --------------------------------------
                     W.P.(C).No.11994 of 2009
                 --------------------------------------
                      Dated: APRIL 15, 2009

                            JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a dealer registered under the Kerala

General Sales Tax Act. The final assessment for the year 2004-

05 was completed under sec.17D of the Act. However, the same

was ex parte. According to the petitioner, he is only a works

contractor exclusively working for the Indian Oil Corporation.

Petitioner could not file objection to the pre-assessment notice

since at that time he was bed ridden on account of a spinal

problem. He also points out that instead of the books of

accounts for the year 2004-05, the assessing authority has called

for the account books for the year 2003-04. Ext.P5 is the final

assessment under sec.17D. According to the petitioner, sec.17D

itself provides for an opportunity to file an application to re-open

the assessment with the consent of the commissioner. Petitioner

has filed Ext.P9 petition in this regard. Petitioner seeks a

direction to the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P9 and to stay

W.P.(C).No.11994 of 2009
2

further proceedings for recovery of the tax assessed pending

disposal of the same.

2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also. I

am of opinion that in so far as sec.17D provides for filing of an

application for re-opening of an assessment in appropriate cases,

it is only proper that the 3rd respondent considers Ext.P9 and

passes orders on the same expeditiously.

Accordingly this writ petition is disposed of with a direction

to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on

Ext.P9 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month

from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till the

disposal of Ext.P9 and, if the commissioner grants permission for

re-opening the assessment, till fresh orders are passed in the

application for re-opening, further coercive proceedings for

recovery of the disputed tax shall be kept in abeyance.

S. SIRI JAGAN
JUDGE

mt/-