IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 30790 of 2010(W)
1. INDIRA BALACHANDRAN, T.C.HOUSE,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. KOLAZHY GRAMA PANCHAYTH,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.V.JOHN MANI
For Respondent :SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :12/11/2010
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
-------------------------
W.P (C) No.30790 & 30791 of 2010
--------------------------
Dated this the 12th November, 2010
J U D G M E N T
In so far as WP(C) No. No.30790/2010 is concerned
petitioner made an application for a building permit. By
Ext.P1, the Panchayat informed that Lay out Approval of
the Town Planner is necessary for considering the
application. Relying on Exts.P2 and P3 judgments,
petitioner submits that the said stand taken in Ext.P1 is
erroneous.
2. I heard the learned counsel appearing for the
Panchayat also.
3. Obviously the application made by the petitioner
is pending. Therefore, what is required is that the
Panchayat should pass orders on the application duly
adverting to Exts.P2 and P3 judgments. This the Panchayat
shall do within four weeks of production of a copy of this
judgment.
In W.P (C) 30791/2010, the petitioners seeks a
direction to the Panchayat to pass orders on the
application made by them for a building permit. Along
W.P (C) No.30790 & 30791 of 2010
2
with the counter affidavit filed by the respondent, it has
produced Ext. R1 (a), the request made by the petitioners
for returning their applications. It is stated that on the
basis of Ext. R1 (a), applications have now been returned.
Therefore, there cannot be a direction to the Panchayat to
pass orders on an application which was got returned by
the petitioners.
Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it
open to the petitioners to make fresh applications if they
so desire, in which event, the same will be dealt with in
accordance with law.
Sd/-
ANTONY DOMINIC
JUDGE
ma
/True copy/
P.A to Judge