High Court Karnataka High Court

Smt Parvathamma W/O Late … vs The Directorate Of Municipal … on 25 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Smt Parvathamma W/O Late … vs The Directorate Of Municipal … on 25 March, 2008
Author: H N Das
gun

I I van- --- 'cu. _. --_

IN THE HIGH C-0119'?' OF KARNA. AKA. A- _ANGALO'RE  A4 

    

w/o LATE SHANKARA1AH.._  " 
AGED ABGU1' ._  '_  =
RIO MADIHALLY ' '
TIPTUR '.:-.'ALUK'  , 
TUMKURVV-DIS1'RICi":'j'-»   

- _ -- - -- Lil

 '   : ._TI-IE' iJ|REcroRA'rE 01:'

, T\_'iUNiCiPAL t'\'OIviiNiSTRA'i'IGN
 'IN KARNATAKA, 9TH FLOOR
VISHWESHWARA TOWER, EANGALCRE 1
REFTD. BY ITS COMMISSIONER

ID

DEPUTY CQMMLSSIQNER
TUMKUR DISTRICT
TUMKUR

/'kt/~/V

U\



3 THE CHIEF OFFICER
TO' N MUNICIPAL COUNCIL
TIPTUR TOWN

TUMKUR DIS'I'RIC'I'

      

{By 31'}: S.Z.A.}{HURE-SHE. AGA F01? R.?.1__A.N'D "2   - *
B A  . A

ri: I-I. .NARAYAN FOR R3)  

THIS WRIT PETITIO'N..V_ [S FI'LE.I:)"01'JDER«'AARTE'C';LES
226 AND 227 op' THE constwrurxsn  INDIA PRAYING

'TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT '---.f)'§'.27;'05,2G05 ISSUED

BY THE R3 v1pE_ AN_b1--.E._ _BY'.IS$U"II*!G"'V-;A"' WRIT OF
CERTIORARI.     

This   er1'i'orV"§1e':aI'i11g this day. the
court made'     

00 A  

'I_ 'I .._.1..'I. .. _ - 1...'... ..

.»§?e"'fiei:1e1'*'s "h1ie_ha:1d Suarucamuuu W' s w"nuug s

  _3__"" respondent - 'Town Mdnicipal Council

011 10.5.2005 the petitioner gave a .

V .1jepmse’ntatien ‘iequesting the respondents to provide a job

K ccixtpaestonate grounds. Under the impugned order the

the petitioner came to be rejected on the ground

0 the deceased was a daily wager and as such no

benefits can be e..x:n…..d tn + e nets. on -re

In:-«Inn. ‘ow up –u

2. The material on record discloses that

the deceased Shankamiah was appointed as Waterman by

Gudigondanahalli Mandal Panchayath in the year

Subsequently, this panchayath came to be vested ”

respondent Town Municipal Council. The T’

_m_____.-_’l 4.- 4.1.. r3«I.:.;’

11:11 A ~.

dated 23.7′.19§6 fiumsscu 1.o.uu:’: L;Luc’…Si:’Ci”r;mIfy’; amen V!

Panchayath, V.

deceased Shankaraiah gthezstttis the
roster system and tt sanction.

Subsequently en’ enhanced
the monthly’ from Rs.500 to

Rs. 1200; ‘+;”e’.Viti;cat*¢i:ensi§1e1iag ‘t1&is”i11atex’ia1 on record the

. ” above, the following:

gems
3,1 wm petition is hereby allowed.

‘ as ; The impugned order dated 27.5.2005 is hereby

quashed.

/”iv”

iii) The matter is remanded to the respondents for

flesh disposal in accordance with law.