High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Kanti Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 26 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Kanti Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 26 September, 2011
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    Cr.Misc. No.31808 of 2011
                                   Kanti Devi wife of Late Birsh Manjhi
                                                  Versus
                                          The State Of Bihar
                                                -----------

2. 26.9.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal

Code.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is not

named in the First Information Report but was implicated on

the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused and

there is no recovery from his possession and there is only one

other case pending against her.

Considering the same, let the petitioner above

named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to

the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Gopalganj

in connection with Gopalganj P.S. Case No.332 of 2010 Trial

No.4018 of 2011, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the

bailor shall be Amarjit Manjhi, brother of the petitioner and the

other bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will

give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with

the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information

to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii)
-2-

That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform

the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other

case of similar nature after her release in the present case

and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iii)

That the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will

receive the police papers on the given date and be present on

date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given

dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable

to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner

will be well represented on each date if she fails to do so on

two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner has been implicated repeatedly at the instance of

the local police who is hostile to the petitioner and seeks

protection of a person well reputed doing social service in the

area. Under the circumstances, the petitioner is directed to

appear before the Head Priest of local Temple, Gopalganj

within fifteen days of her release and file a certificate about

the same in the Court. On filing of the certificate the petitioner

will be granted provisional bail for a period of six months. In

case, the petitioner does not file a certificate about her

reporting to the Head Priest within two weeks of her release

from jail custody, she shall be noticed for cancellation of bail.

During six months the petitioner is expected to engage herself
-3-

in fruitful activities under the guidance of the Head Priest,

local Temple, Gopalganj and at the end of six months she will

file a certificate of her conduct in the court below issued by

the Head Priest. If the certificate granted to the petitioner is

found satisfactory, the court below will confirm the provisional

bail granted to the petitioner and in case it is not, the

petitioner will be taken into custody.

Narendra/                        ( Anjana Prakash, J. )