High Court Kerala High Court

Jasmine Ahammed vs State Of Kerala on 6 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
Jasmine Ahammed vs State Of Kerala on 6 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 7065 of 2009()


1. JASMINE AHAMMED, AGED 38 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.SUNILKUMAR

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :06/01/2010

 O R D E R
                       K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                     ---------------------------
                     B.A. No. 7065 of 2009
                 ------------------------------------
             Dated this the 6th day of January, 2010

                            O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section

438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the

accused in Crime No. 2336/2009 of Perumbavoor Police Station,

Ernakulam District.

2. The offence alleged against the petitioner is under

Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on

22.12.2009, the following order was passed:

“After having heard the learned

counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Public Prosecutor, I am of the

view that before disposing of the Bail

Application, an opportunity should be

given to the petitioner to appear before

the investigating officer. Accordingly,

there will be a direction to the petitioner

to appear before the investigating

officer at 9 A.M. On 29.12.2009. The

petitioner shall produce a copy of the

order before the investigating officer.

B.A. No. 7065 of 2009 2

Post on 06.01.2010.

It is submitted by the learned

Public Prosecutor that the petitioner

will not be arrested until further

orders in connection with crime

No.2336/2009 of Perumbavoor Police

Station, Ernakulam District.

Hand over copy to both sides.”

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor that the petitioner

has complied with the direction contained in the order dated

22.12.2009.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of

the case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I

am of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the

petitioner. There will be a direction that in the event of the

arrest of the petitioner, the officer in charge of the police

station shall release him on bail on his executing bond for Rs.

15,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the

satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following

conditions:

B.A. No. 7065 of 2009 3

A) The petitioner shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and
when required;

B) The petitioner shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence.

C) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail.

D) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

ln