High Court Kerala High Court

Rajasree.L. vs The Director For Higher Secondary on 20 November, 2007

Kerala High Court
Rajasree.L. vs The Director For Higher Secondary on 20 November, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 34157 of 2007(N)


1. RAJASREE.L.,D/O.K.P.MADHAVAN PILLAY
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DIRECTOR FOR HIGHER SECONDARY
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

3. THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION

4. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.SUBRAMANIAM

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :20/11/2007

 O R D E R
                         S.SIRI JAGAN,J
                  ================
                   W.P.(C).No.34157 of 2007
               ======================
            Dated this the 20th day of November, 2007


                           JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a High School Teacher (Hindi), working in

Government High Schools. According to the petitioner she is

eligible for promotion as Government Higher Secondary School

Teacher (Hindi) in the 25% quota reserved for Government

school teachers. According to the petitioner there are vacancies

of Government Higher Secondary School Teacher (Hindi), in

schools near to her home town. However, the first respondent is

not considering the claim of the petitioner.

2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also.

He would submit that the petitioner has to apply when

applications are called for for appointment of Higher Secondary

School Teachers. In the facts and circumstances of the case,

there would be direction to the first respondent to consider and

pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5 if the same has been received

and is pending as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within

two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

While doing so the 1st respondent shall consider whether there

W.P.(C).No.34157/2007
2

are vacancies and if there are, whether applications can be

invited for filling up the same.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
dvs