* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI, AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on :10.08.2011
Decided on : 13.09.2011
+ CRL.APPEAL NOS. 292/1998, 405/1997, 407/1997 & 424/1999
CRL.A. 292/1998
STATE ..... Appellant
versus
SANJAY @ SANJU ..... Respondent
CRL.A. 405/1997
AMRISH CHOUDHARY ….. Appellant
versus
STATE ….. Respondent
CRL.A. 407/1997
STATE ….. Appellant
versus
NASEEM AHMED @ RAJA & ORS ….. Respondents
CRL.A. 424/1999
NASEEM AHMED ….. Appellant
versus
STATE ….. Respondent
Present: Ms. Aishwarya Rao, counsel for appellant in Crl. A.405/1997
and for respondent in Crl. A.292/1998.
Mr. Sanjay Ghosh, for respondent in Crl.A. 407/1997.
Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate for appellant in Crl. A. 424/1999 and for
respondent in Crl. A.407/1997.
Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) along with Sh. Harsh Prabhakar,
Advocate, on behalf of the State.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. P. MITTAL
Crl.A.Nos.292/98, 405/97, 407/97 & 424/99 Page 1
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be
allowed to see the Order? Yes
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes
3. Whether the Order should be reported
in the Digest? Yes
Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat
%
1. The present criminal appeals are disposed of in terms of the separate judgment
passed today in Criminal Appeal No.40/1998 titled Harvinder Pal Saini Vs. State.
2. For detailed order please see the above mentioned judgment.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT
(JUDGE)
G.P.MITTAL
(JUDGE)
September 13, 2011
Crl.A.Nos.292/98, 405/97, 407/97 & 424/99 Page 2