~ IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATA;gx,~-- I A' CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWADU' % DATED THIS 1 rm SAY 0;? N'0VEM'é§_l§; _ BEFORfi : 1 v HON' BLE MR. JuSriC:;1:~V.RAM'h§§)ia.§b3V;,'§éE:_:)'3Y wm' PEYTITION ;¢o.3'1.2.1u'i()L0'F4._VF2068" _§3PR:x.$A:$ ABSENT ) 3; .'1c:c1 BANK THE SANGLI BANK LTD A KING COMPANY INCORPORATED , 'UNE)ER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1913 ,. 'HAVING ITS REG!) OFFICE AT' RAJAWADA CHGWK SANGLL INTERALIA A BRANCH AT JAMKHANIJI REP BY YFS BRANCH MANAGER, SR1 ARUN GOPAL DEVALAPURKAR RI O JAMKHAND RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ART1226 AND
‘.227 OF THE CONSTITUTXON OF INDIA WITH A PRAYER T 0
SET ASIDE THE ORDER BATED 19.9.2008 PASSEDBY
il?*’\
Rczgar Yqiana rcquixing ixnplementafion of the Scheme:
strictly in accordance with the rule cf iaw and
and the Reserve Bank 0:1″ India having;
observations with regard to the __meove:ry” H u
‘when not coznpiicd with by the
premature and liable to be .
3. That a;3p1icafis;;x..JV:A”x:§=Aa:;; filing statement
of objections dated 23;’.7v:.21.’)03« _ inter alia
refuting thg; o{ that the rejection
of app’_}ic:§’§iop:V’3» 7 Rule 11 CPC does not
arise, V.ruf11n:M regard to the material
avexfments and the pleadings of the parties,
that the :n€r锑aéserfion$ of the defendant that the
;;;;::1i:.;ti 2:¢.;11.¥;a.. ;;:g;t mowed the rules and mgulations and
ii3,.§i*c:fo;v:;’ suit is not maintainable, and accordingly
mjectefl. the plea and dismissed the IA by the order
WK
4. The rejection of statemtmt of
governed by Order 7 Rule 11 CPC and .,
petitioners to establish that (a) tlfi
a cause of action; or (b) : that rc1ief .”:_
unde1valucd;(c) that the Qazucd, V’
but the plaint is stamped;
(cmhat the suit appears the plaint to
be barred }.aw;%je) filed in duplicate
and (1) with the provisions of
Ru.1e~’.?. I13; cxcéat for the assertion that
the “fl*.i’c: Central Scheme in respect of
recqvczy of ~1ind€:r {E6 Prime Minister’s Rozgar Yejana,
. – ‘t1it=:x:r.’=, 5si:ras””1;o whatsoever before the court to
-__ of the petitioner.
~ _ 5:. Sufiicc it to state that in exercise sf extraordinary
“ii jfifiédicfion under AI’t.22′? of the Constimtion of intiia, the
’23rde:* not being shown to be fiithttl’ illegal or to have
occassioned injustice to the petitioners, does not cal} for
iI1t{2I’fCI’cfiC€. R
ea» ‘
The: Writ petition is V’§?ith01It.:I}i{€»I”iI’ u u ‘ .
rejected.
%
csg