Manoj Kumar vs The Bihar State Food &Amp; Civil S on 2 December, 2010

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                     CWJC No.9756 of 2010
                   MANOJ KUMAR, S/O LATE BHASO SINGH, R/O MOHALLA JAI
                   PRAKASH NAGAR, WARD NO.-22, P.O. & P.S. KHAGARIA,
                   DISTRICT- KHAGARIA.
                                                           .... PETITIONER.
                                           VERSUS
                   1.   THE BIHAR STATE FOOD & CIVIL SUPPLIES
                       CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH THE MANAGING
                       DIRECTOR, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT 5TH FLOOR,
                       SONE BHAWAN, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA.
                   2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BIHAR STATE FOOD & CIVIL
                       SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED, 5TH FLOOR, SONE
                       BHAWAN, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA.
                   3. THE CHIEF OF PROCUREMENT, BIHAR STATE FOOD &
                       CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED, 5TH FLOOR,
                       SONE BHAWAN, BIRCHAND PATEL PATH, PATNA.
                   4. THE DISTRICT MANAGER, BIHAR STATE FOOD & CIVIL
                       SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED, MUNGER.
                   5. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CUM CHAIRMAN,DISTRICT
                       TRANSPORT COMMITTEE, BIHAR STATE FOOD & CIVIL
                       SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED,MUNGER.
                   6. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MUNGER.
                   7. LALAN KUMAR SINGH, S/O SRI JANARDAN PRASAD
                       SINGH, R/O VILLAGE MALAYPUR, P.O. MALAYPUR
                       (BARHAT),DISTRICT-JAMUI.
                                                        ....... RESPONDENTS.
                                           -----------

05/ 02.12.2010 Learned counsel for the respondents is present.

On 29.11.2010 when this case was called out for

hearing in admission matter, no one appeared for the petitioner and

the case was adjourned as a last chance.

Today also when the case is called out for hearing in

admission matter, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to

press this petition.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-

prosecution.

(S. N. Hussain, J.)
Sunil