IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.2066 of 2011
Sudhanshu Singh son of Late Tripit Narayan Singh
Versus
The State Of Bihar
-----------
3/ 13.07.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
By order dated 02.02.2010 and 29.06.2010 passed in Cr.
Misc. 1984 of 2010 and Cr. Misc. No.16136 of 2010 respectively,
the petitioner was refused bail and now the prayer bail has been
renewed on the ground that he is in custody since 16.11.2009.
Considering the same, let the petitioner, above named,
be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five
thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other
surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the
Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Lakhisarai, in connection with Birpur
(Barahiya) P.S. Case No.67 of 2009,subject to the conditions (i)
That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who
will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with
the petitioner and another bailor shall be Pankaj Kumar, brother of
the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to
the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That
the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court
concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar
nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court
below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of
bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an
undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date
2
and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on
two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be
liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) That the
petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do
so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
JA/- (Anjana Prakash,J.)