High Court Karnataka High Court

Sanjiv @ Sanju Nagusa Katwe vs The State Of Karnataka By Dharwad … on 12 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Sanjiv @ Sanju Nagusa Katwe vs The State Of Karnataka By Dharwad … on 12 March, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
 

IN THE HIGH (roam OF KARNATELK3 '   3 

CXRCUIT BENCH Ajf 'i>';%%_§g'»,;2Lf\.=§:<;§TsJ.';»'A  '--  
{hated this the 3.2Fh_dayA:4cf€vf3A§'ch  J, " "
7HEfDN'BLE   ;i)'31§/&iDIA' 'G' 

Criminal Pefifigfi l'\ic:;"7

Batman;

fa.)

HUBLI

sANJ:isj @::_sANJU N,A'Gi_U_ 
A(}_E_D ABOU"§7;:.3._9 YEARS  
QCC B'Us:NE3'S, _ '  .

we SEIETRUR'*PARK;\[IDYAI\IAGAR
HUBM.     

PARG$f£RAMVS/C_hV4f}§{ANSA KABADE

§AGE.D ABGIXI' :42 YEARS
   xacc: BUSINESSRIO KAMARIPETH
   HHBLI 

V  "NA<',322z;é;.% ,;és,I,?;:: MASHUSA KATAWE
A 4:33;; .'zé}.Bi3U'F .-22 YEARS
»..._<::<:_c: ~B_U:E§INESS R/O 4m

KAMARIPEFH
 PETITIGNERS

  (£§£"s:¥: : R' B CONTRACPOXQ, ADV)

,-/
xv

 



 

And:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA V  V
BY BHARWAD SUB URBAN  ' ._ 
POLICE R/B PUBLIC PROSE»QU'}'fO£%'
HIGH comm BUILDING,    A ' - =  ~
DHARWAD    

(By sn : ANANI} K NAvAL&s-mgxjfu,  Vi:

CRi..P FELEI} £}';'g.- '«s.3Es ? §§1ig».§:R,_P,c BY THE
AfiVOCA'I'E FOP? '£'HE:.AvP{'sTiTIV(}£$§"§E';I~"§ "i?1§A?'1§¢G THAT THIS
HUMBLE  MA'? ""382: F'L?£.'A»$ED TO GRANT
ANTICIPA?-61%;     VPETETIONERS AND
maEcr1QN's%%E;é;§{__p;3gs§ 3E..I$s§J§:D TO THE 1.0: OR TO
THE E;u'_;{.3B~'{:}1i"{iI";.<.;%I\[V_VfI'{) RELEASE THE PETITIONERS
ON mg}; "IN  THE ARREST IN DHARWAI}
SUB»URB"p;.z§ E"?,S;  mé;N¢~..39/ 2909.

  CI§§M£§--'--§AL PETITIGN COMING ON FOR

1' (:j;}'4.".1'._'V."),%*."-R'S«.'\lT'~§.~:VIA:VI*3 DAY, mg COURT' MADE THE FOLLOWING:

  for the m$po3:1dc:m;.

ORDER

Irrarncd Govezrnment Plcader is directed to take

A\’~*'”

2. This petition is filegi by the petitioners V’

of anficipatozy bail in the event cef_t}:;.t:i_r az’z*:éi’i11’Aj%§;3::’ii1a¥§:fi{>I1V

wit}: Crime: No.39] 2009 of Sub–{_§’rba1j_t’

the aflaged offence undm” Stéfitiqns thfi = L’

Karrxataka Excise Act arid A. 1 1″] W’
Section 34 cf IPC. . 3 A 1

3. It is V2w.’;:afi1nd 12.45pm, the
accused the spirit which
was and ‘?T for the purpose
of with thze 13611:: of accused

N0s.3_ _a11é 4~.w W31_e’:z filefifilvere transpcsrtitzg the same from

‘~ _ Gcrfto gfifibfi, at fhai”fime, they were caught.

4.. H ieamed counsel for the petitioners and the

‘ . V 1earn”‘c:dV”‘Qp’.é€mment ?1eaeier.

— x M A CESE WES registered against these petitioners for

” aiisged ofihnces under Sections 32, 34 and 3&8 (Irf {ha

.§’

Karnamka Excise: Act and uader Sections _

511 I/W Sectien 3-“ii of IPC. It is the _ti1cL:é’

iearzlsd counsel for the petitioi)§:1’s:.,.r¢ste:::i’i1av’c ¥::ee;i”gr.a§1tc€i L.

and the petitioners are tfié’-alfiegéé g3fi’ences.

Accezriingly sought for Vv

7′. F€:t;i’tio;1’cx%sV 3’11: scfiuségfi. N031, 2 and 5. It is seen

that while; spirit fmm Goa to £i1;bIi, (311 the

, &_ way’~§’.th¢_$;e xwere caught and the Police said to

‘}f:1VLai.veV :1==V€’::’3!3f?ItT}L’.’ ‘:’£L’£?.'(_2_ gpizit which was iikely to be used for

H iliicit liquor, However, the petifioners

a1*e’.é;ypf§héiidiz1g armst. They are said to 1):: pemxanent

rcsigienvfé of Hubli, as such it may not his ciificult to seczrnre:

” “tt{é:r’A’13resence for the purpose of investigation and trial.

§«*»~

{£3} They shall’ mark iheir aiierzdarzce»
Sunday between 10.C:”0M€l.”I}’:.’ 5. A
before the Dharwad Sigh-Ejrixm Felice; :gi.s7;’r– ‘
fitriher {}3″d8?’S. ” VV .

A India

mpkl