CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Club Building (Near Post Office)
Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
Tel: +91-11-26161796
Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2010/001851/8934
Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2010/001851
Relevant Facts
emerging from the Appeal:
Appellant : Mr. Jadhav K.G
"MAULI" S.No. 32, Shelarmala
Katraj Kondhawa Road,
Katraj, Pune- 411046
Respondent : Mr. R. K. Kukreja
Public Information Officer & RPFC-I
Employees Provident Fund Organisation
Ministry of Labour & Employment,
Bhavishya Nidhi Bhawan,
14, Bhikaji Cama Place,
New Delhi- 110066
RTI application filed on : 14/03/2009
PIO replied : 20/04/2009
First appeal filed on : 30/04/2009
First Appellate Authority order : 19/05/2009
Second Appeal received on : 03/10/2009
Sl. Information sought Reply of the PIO
1 Date of appointment with post. Francy Joseph, RPFC-I, 16/05/83, PFI
(Gr.1)
Ajit Kumar, RPFC-II, 23/02/99, APFC
V.K Patil , APFC-21/10/76 , LDC
R.C Waghchure, APFC- 26/10/76, LDC
K.D Mulla,APFC 21/10/76,LDC
2 Places of their postings and durations and portfolios Posting profile at Annexure ‘A’.
they dealt with. Information regarding portfolio not
available in HRM-I Section.
3 Copies of rent agreement from beginning to up date Not available in HRM-I section
during their stay at respective places.
4 Names of the family members as recorded in service Not available in HRM-I Section
book
5 Copies of property return filed by the above officers Not available in HRM Section
from beginning to up date
6 Address of their native places/home town as record in Not available in HRM Section
service book.
7. The Xerox copies of Transfer Policy, Circulars etc of Copy enclosed
class-I officers i.e. APFCs and above
8. Circulars regarding the putting of restrictions on the No such circular is available in the records
OIC’s for not putting extra burden on the EPFO on of the HRM-I Section.
creation of new regions.
Page 1 of 2
Grounds for the First Appeal:
Unsatisfactory reply by the PIO.
Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):
The First Appellate Authority vide its letter dated 19/05/2009 directed the CPIO to furnish details as
regards to points no. 7(b),(c),(d) & (f) of the first appeal.
Grounds for the Second Appeal:
CPIO and First Appellate Authority denied the information as regards to point no. 7(e) & 7(g) of the first
appeal.
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:
The following were present
Appellant: Absent;
Respondent: Mr. R. K. Kukreja, Public Information Officer & RPFC-I;
The Commission has received a letter date 29/07/2010 from the appellant stating that he wants to
withdraw the appeal.
Decision:
The Appeal is withdrawn.
This decision is announced in open chamber.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.
Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
12 August 2010
(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.) (VN)
Page 2 of 2