-1- R.F.A.NO.1279[201O IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 157 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2010 BEFORE THE I-ION'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAME$fi:m" ' 5; r.- R.F.A. NOJ279 OF BETWEEN: 1. SR]. CHANDRASHEKAR BABU,.7 AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 2. SR1. SRINIVASARAJU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. '_ 3. SR1. KASHI, AGED ABOUT 32.YEARs.,~-- ' 4. SR]. " AGED S 5. SMT. f;EEI..AV;tX'i4f£k?S**'¥:I1VI1'A."'uf ' ~ ' AGED ABOUT 65_YEARS'.' .. No.5 IS THE w1':rE'AND~.N5~s_.2'qD 4 ARE CHILDREN O'F,LATE = P.R.I2AI3HAKI21sHNA"s...._..__. « AND ALL ARE RESIDING AT '*._RAGHAVENDRA STORES s.._G.1?_ALY.AjMAiNA'§:;QAD vE1\zKAf.rEsv.rz_u~2A~TJ.AYoUT DRC 130, BANGALORE -- 560 029. _ "(BY SR1. GAA:GADHARA.s., ADV.) NALLAMMA ~ W'/O MADALINGAM , ' gAe:;ED ABOUT 54 YEARS No.9--1 , 10?" CROSS S.G.PALYA BANGALORE -- 560 029. APPELLANTS RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. M.RAMACHANDRA REDDY, ADV.)
R.F.A.NO. 1279 (2010
THIS RFA FILED U/ S 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT 81 DECREE DTD 22 . O4 .20 1 0 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.63()6/2005, ON THE FILE OF THE XLIV ADDITEONAI,
CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE.
THE SUIT FOR POSSESSION.
THIS R.F.A. COMING ON FOR ADMISSION I’
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOVVING:
This appeal by the defendants/’tenants 3
against the judgment and deereehdatedpp passed
by the Court of XLIV _CI_ty Bangalore
(CCH ~45). i ‘ I I
2. By the Court has
decreed the ‘suit resepondentw-landlord by directing
the appellantsb veto’ and to hand~over vacant
of the”–vsu_It_.schedu1e property Within three
Court has also ordered an enquiry
regardingOvdeterninnation of mesne profits from the date of
the sudtypttllyvhanding over of vacant possession of the suit
= . Olpprotperty. I
Iluearned Counsel appearing for the appellants
“”..submitted that the appeal may be disposed of by
granting four months’ time ie. till the end of December
2010 to the appellants to voluntarily vacate and to
kw/I
R.F.A.NO.1279(201O
deiiver vacant possession of the suit schedule premises
to the respondent/ plaintiff.
4. On the facts of the case, I accept the subm-is_s»;dIiV.j’
made by the learned Counsel for the appelltfints 1
accordingly, the appellants are granted ‘ _
to voiuntarily vacate and to deliver vetcaiit pos.s’essti0i1 5:”
the suit schedule premises to thed’ere:spQnder1t/V’ptétiritiff.
5. Subject to the abcv’e,’A and decree
impugned herein ésihail stahd V
Ifiage