High Court Karnataka High Court

Shafiulla Baig vs Hayath Bi on 30 July, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Shafiulla Baig vs Hayath Bi on 30 July, 2009
Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana
'$923 HSNBLE Ma JEJSTICE "%{."E'a'.%{§S£{;é;'y?§?~i}i;§§§§;.;%.f€A V'

BE'FWEEE'sI:

:N THE §§§£}%% €Q{} RT 39 §{AR,?§2%T&§{;%,  

E

mxm '§"E--~§S 032 '"§""I»IE 38*??? §;;%;"f'--i."3E'   kk

BEFQRE   uj

asa ma 1k3s?%€§E"2m7  

S}§AFE§iLA §A§{_L§--$1N{:§'?';Q};fi.§._'§?%' ?§;§:S:'=" 

E

ggy SEE: N maagggg sg S E!§J;%Y3%%:%}E%:L5;§}

{Q

95/3 _{$_¥".£zé§~}::::§;§;Z;§:L{'i mg A « 
AGES gagawijw 3;? "{i%.$  

Sm $AE5§'3§fiT4§§!E'A:.§;%*;§€E€f;é_g%s;. k§§§~:;&.§§a:   L 

m$§§--:%j&;a gl;é:?~'§ , jf  
Sig SE{';%_}?'§.Ei.ILL f§ 335;;
AC3§E--?{°}_ fi;B{m}E'f:"'L'3%2 ms

% A3A§?§§;:Lm 3,%;::é ALEAS JAFEEELLA was
»s;*»::;% 'Lzf%3'i,E %ks:a1mu am 3513

 _fi%;%i3«a3§g1%{_L*§;{§'§' 43 'mg

§§?2a§«§:jm; maim

 S/Q§ .§,._;3§'}5'E S}~L%F£UL§,-A; BAEG
  z%BQEJ'§' 38 YRS

'AA"§Q:$'"EMfi Baaam
...b,'Q LATE Sfififililhfifi mm

AGECB z5;BGU'I' 36 YES
ALL é§RE E/fix'? SQLUE "s£'EL§.Q%§«E
SQLUFE HQBLI §sfI;*»'§G:%BE TQ

BAFQGALQRE fii S'?  $??EL_L;%  TS



aswam B: swag mgm 3*? 33% mg    A %

E S§v'§'ii zA§»g:1EUm>§N

we Hamm 5:

AGED 3300? 5% YRS

Rm? smug \£'.iLLAGE  %
smug I~IC)BL.I , MAGAL»1i'Q
BANSALGRE ms?  "

2 R;mULLA BAKE    « M 
sjo LATE: 13353:»: 2:592:16;     
AGED Aaamf 54 YRS%   1

Rf:-'~iT S5}Z,{§i.'é;»';'v'§.i;{;z'~§;é:E%3 I i  %

s0L:J;4z= §~§.{LT2=;}B m "3X!E§%.C;E~ADI "";{'Q' %

BAEKSALGVRE«§E:Sf§°«._ '~....__ % %  agsmmgms
{B'*:' SE} : Q 3 3A%§Ag$:}«*;§§§é;;

 F%§*:LE§%%kkk:g%[;s%. mg G? spa AGRENST "mg

%%%;:::%:>«{3%§.%m:;~§':*%%ssg mgaag away}: 2,3283? pagsm :3»:

 1.

_§§7%;’i3{}{§_5 SN TEEE FELE Q?’ TEE E3RL5CEVE§,-
JULI_”}{Z%.fE RR§¥’I.ANAGAR;’3&\é§ §aLL@’i3’tz’§NG THE

‘–..V.v_A?P§%3;é;L A§*J£}f’g”SEfZ”3’ENG aging ‘THE JL}.§7GER:’IEN”‘i’ fiiféfi
§.’;_’%ECEE’-E .m?:’£% E§: gmagsgg @8339 mg Qgsxm

-&T%;«.%§23/:99~«; ms TEE §”ELE $1? $53 CW1; JUQGE
% __ ~§-.ZiR.’@V§*~f.4._} &”J§ViFC, §v’¥.fi;G§;§E,

‘fE?I:ES REG{,EL;-‘XE smmm A??E$§,.- C@M§NG mg

“‘E?’§}f?i?:ADhéESSIQE’€ THES E3535?’ BEFQRE TEES Cfiifigi ‘FEE?

A ‘C;®UR*F MABE firm: §’§§.£,QE§f§NG:

4

J UDGMEN T

§’Ja;:~z@ appearecf an behalf of tha

the appeal is listed far a&:r2issie:s§;$. té:Ci§£”£f;3;’«_ -17$-a.?.é::.u

previeus date when the apgzeai Aiaaii beai-:A.?;i3’*ceci?;

admission 022 54/05/2082? V1;a%<.a- 'Vj1f%a'§rej§;;e3:':€;a?g3?ez1
an fiehaif Q? the a,ppe1£aifi_%f':*~:$2§:ag;§ '{§<x§§ i*z":¢$.tte:* was called

twice <31': that §;aj§?,,_ Hcr:::.%':a!§:*, afijeumeé the

appeai arfzrzé 1'%%*%:3$}é<;.,"'*..__ "'ET*;ré1*2 Eaday, fi';'}@I"'6 is 219
mpre$e:"2ia€£$%:«–_ é:: the appeiiargi. Tftzés shawg
t1'1v:»i§: ayfkeiiéxzt isu"izsiz-««';§::ter&$'€&….§~:§:*<.s3ec:g_:i$z2=V. .

Sd/-

Judge