%'"§£G§~§ CQWRT
§ awum-_ms_:mRwAmm wam cmw my mmmmm mcaw com? 0? mamm§<<:,z::
in THE man comer on »*21¢A*{i"AIiA.V " "
cmcurr amen AT " '
DATED THIS THE 9% 1)4.t.1z_"_ on F3_1i'auAI¢{.?;
I-1=:£s$'r6»'§£ »
ms HOWBLE am. 3531*?
THE I«1ormz.,n%; :.t1§.%;ii:si%Ifxcma\,a;mL?«:*,z-rrxnpvrzrs
'
nmwmmn
Rahui S] o.NeeIakantha,VV"--. '
R/at H.NustvSh;a}3;abad, Chittapur'I'a1u.1;,
Guibarga District.
3. Srih/ianan Malik,
S/<::.Ab1.-).._
This MFA is filed under S€c1ioI;"'173(It.) 'e:~f_ :12: praying
against the judgment am}. awax;:,...;1atea..FA15.'3'.'2eo6,'passed in
MVC.No.56-4/2005 on the of IEV!_'*v..IK'c'iditionai Civil Juége
(Sr.Dn.) 8:. Membsr, MACT--VIII,'a§3oWing the claim
partition for comptin--safi(§tt enhancement of
comptmsation. _ =..
Thisvt}.-.1-F..A on'»£§2=.i:e;a:i.~.r2g_ fins day, SABHAHIT 4.,
dtalivered fl}; __ ~'
" V' * _
This apfital by who sustaéned persona} injuxy
cefifizecgfienvt pe19so:1.a=:l' disability in a motor acciéent that
is filed being aggrieved by the quantum of
tt..A'_VVt?eompe§:§sagti§§n, by :1; Additional Civil Jutige (Sr.Dn.) and
VV"'..A_.:\;2e;;ubcx;' ..ha?I2§<.i'i*:\;*;:I, Guibarga in Mvc.No.s64/mos dated
the pendency of this appeal seeking for
_§m;ht:§t1%ééfitent of compensation, I.A.I/O8 has been filed under Order
t 27 CPO, seeking for permission to lead additional
téxtidcncc Iegaxfling further treatment taken by the claimant-
injumdfippcllant herein regarding replacement of the kllfiif joint. £1:
§f« <5 AX """
is avcrred that a sum of Rs.I,74,621j~ is pmdfiaag towards {ha
;;;;;fi.f'...'REi31§(3NiiENfi*si
g zgwsi £..uUE~Hfi9Jt;f 'EWKWAIMKA Him-i COURT OF KARNATAKA I-HGH COUR? OF ; §~§§@,fi QQURT
further itreatment of the injuzeei and pztesent bills
has been produced along with the afxplieafiensfgf'-.';§rc§¢{£§ctjd1-;_{of ':
additioaai evidence filed under»e e:g1erV"4.1%"
appeliaat herein while he was Hider a
motorcycle bearing No. j' by oV1A:v1e Ravi on
7.12.2004 at about §0.30p1;1_ by Tata Safari
bearing regstlafiché by its driver in
a rash and to the motor cycle
and pefitiééneg disability and therefore
claim pefifisii ffiegi driver, owner and insurer of the
ofiending xrehicie: ~ V
' pct'fi;ion_was resisted by respondents 1 and 2 by filing
n V sep}§L::§ié..c§j’c;§i>igns{‘Qtatment. inquiry was held by the Tribunal
examined. himself as PW .1 ans} aiso
PWIQ-Medical Offwer who treated him arid certified his
The claimant also got marked Exs.F’1 to P19. On behalf
V ‘V respondents, no era} or documentary evidence was
3é&e1.ueed. The Tribunal held that the accident occuued due ts rash
V. and negligent driving of Tata Safari driven by its driver and
petitioner sustained irljmy in the said accifient and has aiso
‘\_-‘;’r~»5″
Iuwuau Ur i’fi.£*”kf§.l”tfii%ia”&J§”W*”§a i”£l\.3’E”‘! !..U%.IKlAL;’3_” mammmxemx =’ -1-T,~3§?3¥*«%fi«7ffire§{$% HIGH CQURT OF KARNAVAKA HIGH CQUR? £3? KARNATAQ HIGH COEURE?”
sustained consequent disabfiity and awalfieé’ ‘ .
Rs.1,4?’,’?65/~ with interest at 3% 2frem: ‘£he
petition till the date of
‘compensation shall be paid by the
respondents and j on 15.3.2006.
Being aggrieved by the ithe MAUI’ claimant
has pzefe1red_ V’ enhancement of
compensation. :v’fV’143fe§:. mgaxdifig negligence
and entitle@e1_1!’c’_Af0r compensation and liabiiiiy
of the Iespemlenet has become final as the
same net bee11.vehai1e1.3:§;eei by the respondents and wherefore,
deterxem ation in this appeal is:
quaiitum of compensation awaxdeci by the
L “~”V’I’x’ibunAez1_Vis itaatiefiiiate as to call for enhancement in this appeal?
2. Whether the applicatitm flied under Order 41 Rule 27
be allowed’?
K 3) What order?”
we answer the above points as foilowsz
Poini No.1; In the afirmative.
Point No.2: In the aifirmative
vi’ ‘
I=;E:;€«;:’§’ mwmmm HIGH COURT
” m:n¥£fl,l”‘$:i&£l””¥:fk”Q-l!”‘% n”w\.mi”1 muuug ,w;_1f’ EAKNAIAKA PHGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR? €335 –
refunding any amount if the f x
satisfied the order passed by the
stage and the same can be adjuSif1é d…i_n wouid
be awarded by the Tzibugal. Ac<V;§}r<§l§.';%1gi3:,LA wx.=, pafis foliowing
onder: V ' V .
;.A.z/03 filed gmgier (}’1*tié1f41 is allowed. The
judgment and :’}§§if’I(ii1:iona1 Civil Judge
(sx-.911.) and l\:£:3;_£.’V,”;’::”vV,;*A§:I’vI,L}1$ii$%r§;%§_ :Vin:’::M;VC.No.564/2005 dated
£5.3.2006 is remitted :0 the Tribunal to
pass flesh t0 the appellant to
adducc cvidefice ‘kin Ehe document that are now remitted
be ‘pf(.'(§u(E3éE3. thcfiifiéaficr pass the award, in accomlanct: wflh’
is dmzcte’ d to dispose of the pefitsion,
any rate not later than six naenths from the
_. : -i.’1{:”‘l.VfL’?. of bf copy of this cmtier and the lower court mcords.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sci/–
W. JUDGE