Sri C R Shamanna vs State Of Karnataka on 7 December, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT EANGALDEE
DATED THIS THE 07% DAY OF DECEMBER;'_:'2'O'1'£);-if:E A _
BEFORE 

THE HONBLE MR. IUSTICE,H.N.1§'-EzXG}\MC)»HT%\1'J 

¥9i¢i%'§7éR19791/20C§7'{i;B»RES)'    A

BE I W EEN:

1. SR1 c.R.sHAMARNA  j; '
s/0 LATE DR_c.s;RrEEg:*A RAO T ..
AGED  ~    

2. SR1 VENKATESH   "

s/0 C.R.SHAMANNA_ H E
AGED ABOUT 33_YEARS * 'j-~  
BOTH ARE RESIDDXIG AT'  '  - V'

N012/3 , SIDDIVfl\EA'{.A}LAV LAYQ  V.

EANAsHANT;AR1.1T1 S'I'AG_E; '
B£xNGPxLORE*5(§0AO8.5- "  ~~~~~ ~ ~

 = (By SR1". E1.:H.;KALz5fijvGI;  )



 R <_'1-. _sT;ATE OE KARNATAKA
 REPRESENTED BY IS REVENUE SECRETARY
   DEPARTMENT
* R __ vT.DHA1<IA SOUDHA,
' E R BA1$TGALORE.

Eu...-

7""
1

"PETITEONERS



2. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

VIKAS SOUDHA, 4"" FLOOR,

BANGALORE

3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER 3: MUZATRAL _ T? '
OEEICER, BANGALORE SOUTH RODIUM BLOCK
VISWEWARALAH TOWER, " I 1.  
DRAMBEDKARVEEDH1,  
BANGALORE560 om.

4. SR1 ATRAIVIASWAMY " '
PRESIDENT,     
IOINT LEGISLATIVE C-OMEJIITIEE    M Z
VIDHANASOUb;.1eIAR11ee"'"'_. .,    
BANGALORE? ~      ~
SSSS H  '-  3  ~ ~ _  RESPONDENTS
(By SR1 I:}M.N'ATARAj;AgVADDILAG.) '

THISVV 'NR1TV'."vE:?ETITiQN" FILED U/A 226 8?; 227 OR
CONSTITUTIQN. OE {NDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
PROCEEDINGS  PENDING BEFORE THE SECOND

 " «RES-RONDLENT AS"PERS1ANNEXURE~E AND ETC.

V  VVThiS._ p'etitiO_j.1 coming on for hearing this day, the court
rri'ade'AOthe fO~1--10wing;

ORDER

, “”_.In this writ petition the petitioners have prayed for a writ

A the nature Of certiorari to quash the notice dated 17.11.2007 as

J’.

found at Annexure~E issued by the Under Secretary,

Development Department.

2. The impugned notice is in reiatioii to siiow c:iiise’éis

to why the khatha in the nanipe-..__of piet.i_tioners
revoked. Today in W.P.No_,i3548{2ii:Gtiitheirhsthziiiriithefiname of
the petitioner is set-aside to the third
respondent for law. In View of

this deVe1opn:ent:;_ tile prayeriin th-i.s.i*wrVit petition will not survive

for consideration. So also _thei’.in1piigned’19_otice at AnneXure–E is

n0n–e=st in the eye of law; Accordingiyithe Writ petition is

hereby disposed ii

a’):I(2s”K_ ‘

Sd/–

JUDGE