Gujarat High Court High Court

Narendrakumar vs Ms on 13 December, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Narendrakumar vs Ms on 13 December, 2010
Author: A.M.Kapadia,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice Bankim.N.Mehta,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

MCA/2087/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

MISC.CIVIL
APPLICATION No. 2087 of 2010
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 944 of 2007
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

NARENDRAKUMAR
KHUSHALBHAI PARMAR - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

K
N BHATT ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE G & 3 - Opponent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MS
J.K. HINGORANI, LD. ADVOCATE FOR MS. LILU K BHAYA
for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR. DABHI, AGP, for Opponent(s) : 1 - 2. 
MR
DEEPAK P SANCHELA for Opponent(s) : 3, 
MR RA MISHRA for
Opponent(s) :
4, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE BANKIM.N.MEHTA
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 13/12/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA)

Ms.

J.K. Hingorani, learned advocate for Ms. Lilu K. Bhaya, learned
advocate for the applicant, upon instructions received from the
applicant, does not want to press this application and seeks leave to
withdraw this application since the applicant-original petitioner has
already been reinstated in service by respondent No. 4 District
Development Officer, Kheda, in compliance of the order dated
28.10.2009 passed in Special Civil Application No. 944 of 2007 by
learned Single Judge of this Court for which this contempt
application is filed.

2. Mr.

Dabhi, learned AGP, for opponent No. 1 and 2 and Mr. Deepak P.
Sanchela, learned advocate for opponent No. 3 and Mr. R.A. Mishra,
learned advocate for opponent No. 4 have no objection if leave to
withdraw the application is granted.

3. Leave
to withdraw this application is granted.

4. This
application stands disposed of as not pressed and withdrawn.

5. Notice
is discharged.

(A.M. KAPADIA, J)

(BANKIM N. MEHTA, J)

(pkn)

   

Top