High Court Kerala High Court

Ramachandran vs The Special Sale Officer on 22 October, 2008

Kerala High Court
Ramachandran vs The Special Sale Officer on 22 October, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 30756 of 2008(J)


1. RAMACHANDRAN, S/O. RAGHAVAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, THE THRISSUR

3. THE BRANCH MANAGER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :22/10/2008

 O R D E R
                        S.SIRI JAGAN, J
                 ==================
                  W.P(C)No.30756 of 2008
                 ==================
         Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2008.

                        J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P1 proceedings for sale

of the petitioners property for recovery of amounts due under

a loan taken from the Thrissur District Co-opertive Bank, as

per an award in proceedings under Section 69 of the Kerala Co-

operative Societies Act. The petitioner’s contention is that the

petitioner is entitled to reduction in interest as per Ext.P2

Government Circular.

2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the

respondents oppose the prayers. According to him, after the

award is passed under Section 69, the petitioner cannot claim

reduction in interest. The only remedy of the petitioner is to

file an appeal against the award. The period for filing appeal is

also over, since this is a 1998 loan and arbitration award was

passed in 2001, is the contention raised by the Counsel for the

respondents.

3. I am satisfied that the petitioner cannot now claim the

relief prayed for, in so far as the arbitration award has become

final. In view of the above circumstances, the petitioner seeks

W.P(C)No.30756 of 2008 – 2 –

permission to pay off the amounts in instalments. This is also

opposed by the Counsel for the respondents, who would submit

that being a loan of 1998, there is no justification in permitting

the petitioner to pay the amounts in instalments.

4.Having heard both sides, I feel that some more leniency

can be shown to the petitioner in the matter of payment of the

amounts in instalments. Accordingly, I direct the respondents

to permit the petitioner to pay off the amounts due as per

Ext.P1, with future interest, in seven equal monthly

instalments starting from 15.11.2008. Every subsequent

instalment shall be paid on the first working day of after 14th of

every succeeding month, till the entire amount is paid off. If

the petitioner pays the instalments in time as directed above,

the sale contemplated under EXt.P1 shall be adjourned.

However, if the petitioner commits default in payment of any

one of the instalments, it would be open to the respondents to

continue proceedings as per Ext.P1, without having to issue

any fresh notice or proceedings in that regard.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

rhs