High Court Kerala High Court

P.Abdul Karim vs Kerala State Road Transport on 4 August, 2010

Kerala High Court
P.Abdul Karim vs Kerala State Road Transport on 4 August, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 24311 of 2010(L)


1. P.ABDUL KARIM,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :04/08/2010

 O R D E R
                 T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
               ---------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C) No.24311 OF 2010
               ---------------------------------------
           Dated this the 4th day of August, 2010.


                         J U D G M E N T

The petitioner retired as a Charge man from the

Neyyattinkara Depot of the respondent-Corporation on

31.03.2010. The main grievance raised in the writ petition is

regarding the delay in disbursal of the pensionary benefits

including DCRG and commuted value of pension.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner had availed a loan from the State Bank of Travancore,

Manacaud Branch, Thiruvananthapuram and because of the

financial difficulties, the petitioner could not repay the loan

amount. Therefore, the Bank has initiated recovery steps against

the petitioner. Exhibit P2 is the notice issued by the Bank to the

petitioner. It is pointed out that the petitioner has also liabilities

on account of the loan availed from different sources in

connection with the marriage of his daughter which was

solemnized on 08.12.2005. The petitioner approached the

W.P.(C) No.24311/2010 2

respondent for getting the pensionary benefits but no action was

taken by the respondent to disburse the amount. Aggrieved by

the same, this writ petition has been filed.

3. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the KSRTC. It is

pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the

guidelines issued by this Court in W.A.No.289/2001 even though

directs disbursement of the retirement benefits on the basis of

seniority, the same can be varied if ordered by this Court in

appropriate cases. Herein, there is a genuine ground.

In that view of the matter, there will be a direction to the

respondent to consider the sanction of the benefits and disburse

the amount after conducting due enquiry expeditiously, at any

rate, within a period of two months.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
JUDGE

smp