M,F.AfN0.9861;2006
.~ 1 ,
IN THE HIGH. COURT OF KARHATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED TI-H3 THE 473 DAY OF JUICE 2039
BEFORE
THE Howm..E nm..ms*r1cE H.G.RAm:sI-=:< _ ' ,; " H
M.F.A. N0.9861[2Q_Q§'**«.A
BETWEEK: J A.
smaan SAHITYIK SSKMSTI-{A
ms: ASSOCIA'I'£ON REGESTERED
UNDER KARN'A'1'AKA socm-':':Es _
REG1S'I'RA'I'iON am', HAVING {TS Rags.
OFFICE AT NCi).1B, SARAKIKERE, 24TH,
cam PHASE, J P NAGAR,B£1.NG§LLOF§E?8 » ' _ ~ _
REP. BY ms PRESIDENT SR1 GYANCHAED .}£PPE'.LL.AN"1"'
(BY SR1 PI}'I"1'I(}Ei§}€'i%f;iEr1¥:1S}ié_{_,ADE) . «V
SHABD sAH1*ry:'K%%sAMS'1' ?m_
AN ASSOCIA'I'1C-N REGISTEREQ
UNDER i<Z-.*'--'~_RI\IA'1'£fi€7.:°L SQ€',lE"§'IES
§§}fi'GISTRATl0N ACT," r.».m'v:N:3 ITS
was vcxmscg mf NO.12i$}"B
-5*1'1;1 m.1r-J, 565% 03033, IV BLOCK
RA.)A«.iIIiIAGAR"E3ANGALORE 10
125:9, 13$ Ifrsv §'F%E.€';1I3'I§'N'I'
sMT'sA'RoJAv¥g.s: RESPONDENT
g EB’? sé; ff? Hsmsa, ADV.)
” “1′?HiS iéfII”A FILED U/ORDER 43 RULE-1(r3 rejw SE6. :5:
‘*1’.S.£§I£Z),1663/2006 0;»: THE .m.E or? ‘1″‘IriE XXIV ADDL. cm’
}’;}7SE}’.Z;} JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY (C€3H.NO.6), ALLOWING IA
_ ‘Nix: FILED UfORI_’)ER 39 RULES 1 35 2 OF CPC1 132:3}? T1.
TEES MFA COMING 0N FOR WNAL HEARENG, THIS IEAY,
TEE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
the suiéj. ‘V
M.F.A.NC).9861f2006
– 2 _
JUDG§EKT
This appeal by the defendant is .’
an interiocutory order dated 29.5.2-£365 . 1.;xf:é_f,
trial court -~ the Court of the XXIV Iiddifibfiai”€§i15,’._CiV£f1′.:A
Judge, Bangalore, in the
By the iinpugwd order,’ the
app1icat:ion–I.A.Nc:>. 1 filecf piaintifi’
under Order r ‘ 151 of the
CPC by defendant from
ad0pt:ing:?_ ._ ‘the piaixxtjfl namaiy
‘Shabd/Shéaghzfid’ til} the dispasai of
__TIu the lemned Counsel appearing for
the the impuglted order.
AA 00131186} on both sides submit ltjnat the
order sf injunction passad by the mal caurt
_ ” bean aperating mm the Last three year’s i.e. from
293* May 2006. ‘I’hey further submit thfit the evidencse
W
M.F’.A.NO.986lf20€)6
_ 3 BA
is recorded in part: in the suit Having regantl to
fact that the irztefim order has been om1’a¥:ing ”
last: three years anci the suit is almostoat the
deem it appropriate to dispose of71:h{:_’_’ 7-of
direction to the ma
expeditiously. Learned eide;.3.AAsL1Ei)1nit
that their clients woui<VT';:;.ot VA;-§1jdj_o11m1ments
and that they §vej;11_r.;1 fzgiiyf the tzriai
court for " iéji; suit. 'I'11eir
submission—»is on . pgecordirlgly, I make
the fofloveing' '
The t1'iVVé}-.e§fio1.11fii is to dispose of the suit in
~oo.s. LE'~I::v)'.'§'«;1..6E~E__'$5AV;';i'-,/§2{)(}€+"" «expeditiously and without being
.obseru'ations made in the course of
the i3I1§vilgI1(*3(iV'e:if}.'£'{i6T.
Ameag disposeé of. = Sd/*
.. Judge