Gujarat High Court High Court

Praveshbhai vs State on 14 June, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Praveshbhai vs State on 14 June, 2010
Author: K.A.Puj,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/6272/2010	 3/ 3	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6272 of 2010
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

PRAVESHBHAI
RASIKLAL SHAH - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MS
AMRITA AJMERA for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR RASHES RINDANI, Assistant Government Pleader
for Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 2 -
3. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 14/06/2010  
 
ORAL ORDER

The petitioner has filed
this petition under Article-226 of the Constitution of India praying
for quashing and setting aside the order dated 10.9.2007 passed by
the respondent No.3 in respect of instrument registration No.3787
dated 16.11.1998. The petitioner has also prayed for the direction
to respondent No.3 to send the necessary papers to the respondent
No.2 authority forthwith and till disposal of the same by the
respondent No.2 the said order of the respondent No.3 dated
10.9.2007 be kept in abeyance.

Heard Ms. Amrita Ajmera,
learned advocate appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Rashes Rindani,
learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent on
an advance copy being served to the Government Pleader’s Office.

The impugned order is
passed by the Dy. Collector on 10.9.2007. The petitioner has got
alternative remedy to challenge the said order before the Chief
Controlling Revenue Authority. Till this date the petitioner has
not availed that alternative remedy. On the contrary, direction
sought for to the respondent No.3 to send the necessary papers to
the respondent No.2 authority. Such a prayer is quite unusual. If
the petitioner has any grievance against the order the petitioner
should have taken appropriate action in the matter. Be that as it
may. Since the petition is not entertained it is open for the
petitioner to file Appeal challenging the order dated 10.9.2007
alongwith delay condonation application. Such an Appeal and/or delay
condonation application shall be decided by the Chief Controlling
Revenue Authority in accordance with law.

With this direction and
observation this petition is accordingly disposed off.

(K. A. PUJ, J.)

kks

   

Top