High Court Karnataka High Court

The Secretary Dodda Yelachagere … vs The Deputy Commissioner on 12 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
The Secretary Dodda Yelachagere … vs The Deputy Commissioner on 12 June, 2009
Author: N.K.Patil
32:: Tm: man czarmtr an xcamwmm AT Bm§r§ALcRE
mmn arms mm 11" man: er VA
$33033 ': °%" "'*

TH HON'BLE Mn.JU5I:;E n;K;éaiiLkV,u" 2

wax? PETITIOH No.1392§fzda§(GH+Ec{] 

BETWEEH 2

THE SESRETARY HH=_ ,» ~_% e
momma 3sLA5HAsEaz,sAHAKAaa'saneA'"'"
KALAGUR HEBLI v¢'_¥_ 9' *3~'*
K&LAVfiLLI TALUK . M
xnnnxa DISTRICT.» ,~"~"* 'g: ;.jv
,~*,f-- :, {.= %,}4flEE?ITIORER
{BY sax. H c €HE§§£hHU. afiv.y  '"

AND :

1. THE DE?fi$ cfiExis§I§@£a
MnHnYa»§IsTRIcm'.f,
Mmfipya *V" ' *» '

   _____ 

.*§R&fi§§$nE,TA$UK,
=gfixDE§%§zsTgICr

. . . 13.E5FG£*IDEHTS

V HViBY sfi:.figT;fiaaxnnna asan, Has?)

 '.ifix8 war? ysmxwxa Is sxmgn UNDER

 gmxcms 225 am 22? 02* trim ccmxsrzwrzox or
%c«1nnrA Panxrxs T0 Qansa was GRBER Dayan
=.   2c;12.2oo3 passes BY 3.: xx HIS 03923
";_"~..Ei'*;'I*.FG£)3:ilI*:€Z/'76}/C3'?-C¥8 A2' AMJEXURE-C my DIREGT
'. 3.1 wc FGLLGW mus yaaczsuaz caumgaymamgn smvan

-n mawwn: ur mnmmnlnnn tiibfi t.uEf§I£:,_:I.J1' !W£RNA.'I'AKA WWW emm' OF KfiRNA'!'AKfi  fiflififl? OF KARNAYAKA HIGH C093"? 0? MRNATAKK HIGH COW

CLAUSE 12:1; 02 REC {Ens} ¢OfiTRDL 62332-1992,
awn arc.



K
g
3
3
3
E

THIS waxy Psrxwxox canxma mu  fCR
ERELIKINREY HEARING THIS nay, THE ~cGfia$,
MAEE THE FDLLGWIHG: ~~;»_'s

0 3 D 3 n.w-_

Learned Gavarnmant éPieade;}k§¢¢$§t$%V

notice far respenfiant Néfifi anfiuzk-7

2. The' pet;fii9fi§£: *$é$gj1ing the
cerrectnea§4§f t$e€ofidéfi fiaté& 23.12.2038
passed?fw§j$§K»%;;§§a§afifién;w"-~No.1 Mm Tin

N0¢§a¢§f§$[i§}E§d?~¢i§ vida Annaxuxewc and

fox}+§NaVa«;ffirth§r«;w»directian wwwéirecting

re$pan&$fit= No}1  to follow the praceduxa

we-urrmvlun war: 1

___évb$nfem$lat%3""#ndez %%%%% Clauae 12:12 af the

: 3§¢iP§§f¢¢antrnl firdar, 1992, has presented

':he i§§:ant writ yetitien.

tum-u.rnv.nrw1v"x9sw-uaumm u an

3. I have haard the learneé Ccunsel fez

Ethe petitioner and the learned Gav$rnment

Pleads: far zfiapandenta.

:9. wmmnuwnmu wwu nu--«mums Inn IlII"'Vi«
».M_'



n wwwfla Mr mmnwmknnfl fill.-art KaUl:.:lA!€E.__;§.}?' fiflfiwfiififlfi HEKWE amwm" 0? KfiRWfl"Wa%»'% i3°%%fi3.=%W§ €l0UWT fifi' KKWNATKKA HIGH CGURT G? Kfii7iNKTflKA HIGH CQW

4. Learned counsel aypeaxing Vp.f§ "?hath

aides at the out aei: au1:n:itte<;i;"""'??3?*';5":§;lithe

inatant writ Petitian ti;a§}_ $y_ fith§*,
petitioner may be d»iap:i;§a:e<§..4§i"E "

ourzdezz paasad by thig :fm_.;'1:¢; ::*5:ij;;:<1"3'.%2.fi1:,

mattar on 21.4.2o§§ gig fi§;§$.i;5$1/2009

ts:i.B.K.¥v$TA&fig e@%$$Qi§a, ffifi DEEUTY
caxxxssxofiga, gg3fig§ $N3 fi§fi¢HEa; whexain
B imi 1 3.12"   :43.' Elva'?  . .
   Z 'fj};gjV 1z4=1;2:';V1§:V;'i.Vsaioz1 made by the
laaarV'zAi.sgfi"  fifigréaring an both sides as
stziat a c1   Q' fizgiaced on zecerd.

 i£%:::c1:i.x1g*l3r, the Writ Petition iar

 d':!;SpV_{::3e {§1 6+f following the cxtefiazas gsaxssaa in
 " WP wGfl11651r2oa9 DD 21.4.2099 {B.K.FUTTAHE
'yf@@%BA vs. THE nmvuwy conmxssxanzn AND

fauowxgay, with the fallawing dixeatians;

writ iwtition is allmved in gaxrt. The

impugned mrrdax dated 20.12.2908 passed by

A

/WW



 


In
3
E
§
3
3
5
§
5
2
E
5
E
3
5
3
§
5
E
5;
3
§
5

M 'WWW!!! V'! !I\rw-xii-fi\I-'I"'IHIe""M,\m~'as |Efih~:;n,-s '-*m:'4o.~r'W»rtI'\*»s;t.*'6u:a€I"o ¥"lmf"\Ab«ll!"&IE'$£R"'9nfllIr"fiItWI"% usvérswtm-we 'whwwnfi W191!

 _ §ieei:é.{" 

respondent 1%-.:s.l vida Annexure--C is T',i:§;e.;:aby

aet aside and the matter

hack to respondent No.1 ta *’:’1:.e
matte: afresh and -‘

maxi ts after .a,3_’5f»:::j:-‘t:¥,,i.f;q , ‘Vzéaia-r$;n£.bl’-9

opportunity of haarifi*g.._ tc; tTr1:’s-:§a1a’:’t:i:’t:;:i.z:.sc.z::: as
per the :eleva.:i§:V«-p1§o’.j.i;#§..Vg;:x§;£;«.%_f Pyfi Control

arI4=*3~

nrdm-:A witifxin tihrvéa the data at

receipt’ iqf ;1;:: A eff B-;t.a*.’..éz: .

‘Z. _A Z A’ 5Li2Ve.a’Vi?z1e..VV__High Csauxt Gavezzrnment
Plaeacigafi _isV..1′;:–7a{x«;~§;5;:,{t«a;’d to file his Memo «cf

Ag;pveL§.raza1¢.e ‘f?-.22: tize ma;:e;>:cLfients within tam

5&3
jugfié

av*