v.2.B.Lt.£:LAvmHI. ' A'
IN THE HIGH mum OF KARNATAKA AT BAN'§§ALéRri'% H
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY 05*"'N'a4vEry13g#:.i§ '§:1:U'*r,' _
BANGALORE 949., '
AGERE YRS,
A ' ' V . W; 0~.v_1'«: NK1¥}'A«NA--RANAPPA,
35.9113,' 01%;}-iokb ROAD,
3Ffi_BLQCK,«4'fB__s"IffiGE,
BASAVESHWARANAGAR,
V V' _BANGE.-LOf?E «.560 ()'?9. .. APPELALNTS'
x (Bi"Sf?.'i VIJETHA RNAIK. ADVJ
gi1:e»:._
4 _l.'I"'}FiE ASST. REGISTRAR
-4, '0F"CO~OPERATiVE SOCIETIES.
A ';<::zRc1..m, MARGOSA RGAD,
" ' MALLESHWARAM,
BANGALORE.
zxms ASST. REGISTRAR OF
CO~OPERA'I'iVE socxmas,
CHQCLE-3, MARGOSA ROAD,
MALLESHWARAM,
BANGALORE.
3.'I'HE KARNATAKA URBAN
HOUSING SOCIETY L'l'D.,
BANGALORE,
REPBY ITS ADMINISTRATOR.
4.KRISHNAMUR'I'HY,
S/0.LATE.G.GANGAIAH,
AGEA9 YRS,
R/0.1315,6mcRoss. V 5
423 MAIN, CHANDRA'lAYOiJ.'T;"» .
VEJAYANAGAR, 3- § ~ 2
BANGALORE--§S6{) 0%;t).._. . 2
5.312: C.M.VENi~§G{)FAL R.i:nD3r;,; .. V
52.02.50 ms, , .
R/0.NO.7~9, 25": CRO-SS, ' '
SHARADA E3OL.ONY,_ *
BASAVESHWARANAC"3aAR,A .-- V
BANGALORE -7-9. . RESPONDENTS
* {BY s.%AsUqATriA’,’A<3.A'F0R R-1 AND 2, SR1 U.F.KUMBAR, ADV.
R43 A?§'D_B4'xj_s.JAYAi{lJMAR S.PATiL ASSTS. FOR R4 AND 5)
iiiti
APPEAL IS F'¥L.ED 11/53. 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
" H ',m:GH CQERTVACT PRAYING Ti?) SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED in
" " e .T1*E§E'a'gliRI'§'*'i'E'ITFiON NO5844/2006 DATED 8/8/2006.
'Pi-{IS APPEAL COMING ON FDR HEARING THIS DAY,
J : . " -DEEPAK VERMA.J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUBGMENT
an Vfieaumamwnk,1mmmmdecounma%§p§m§td;on
behalf of appellant. Smt.S.Sujatiia, _
Advocate appeared on behalf'
Sri U.F.Kumbar, L '0nv-fisehaif of
respondent No.3. M/Assts, appeared
on behalf of F€${)C}Q§i6fif$ Nefi S
2.hfimfififim&fifl$¢@mmmmmdmmwma
the “has been rendered
infmctueus. -~ that the appeal be
dismissed as mfruf ” accepted.
is. aceefkiiilgly dismissed as having been
1en<iered__ Parties to bear their respective
*Mvs
V T;
Sdflfu
Judge
Sdfiu
Judge