Sri M C Mohammed vs State Of Karnataka Vidhana Soudha on 25 March, 2008

[H ms maxi mum on' KARNATAKA  V; "

nxmn THI8 THE 251-11 nnvtblr    Q i { 7'

3229125 % V V :
mm Hormm Mmmsmfizs  

 

BETWEEN:

SRIMCMOHAMME1) 4 I    5

53/0 HASSAN  _ _  4.  
MAJORINA§Z}E"  4.     »

No.9, 18:' c1;'<_)ss:_  _  «_  *

boDDAVK.ATA'P9A RQAD  '  '

ULSOQR  Y; '  _

BAN<3A:,oR.E_ 550098  _   ._ -- -- mmmonnk

(B? 315;: %s.SHA'K§i.'R  ADVOCATE.)

 "  .1,   s'raTE~ 05* 1<A§r;:A'bAxA

 

 _ *;;mm,..NAVsouDHA
~ _ "§3;x1s{c2.A.1.ar)I:A.b
APPEREDDY"PALYi.,_ 
BANGALOvRE;--~560'.Q38..~~ mssroxmwrs

. (3? ~ 3121 T.'A.'F.AMACHANDRA1AH, (3.9 FOR 12- 1-,
' v.R-3..fro R-6 ARE SERVED.)

.  F1*r::s.,\jvR'ifrw 'PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 85
227 OF' THE.C.O'NSTITU'I'ION OF INDIA PRAYWG TO DECLARE
SECTION'? gem], in as {g} 0? THE KARNATAKA RENT ACT, 1999

j IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, UL'l'RA--VIRUS AND DISCRIMINATORY
 "AND SPE?I'KE DOWN THE SAME AND ALSO QUASH THE
'W.;JUE3.GMEN'I' AND DEGREE IN O.S.NO.8183/99 PASSED ON
  07.013006 ON THE FILE OF' THE 15"' ADDITIONAL CYTY CIVIL
  JUIDGE AT BANGALORE VIDE ANX--C, SO FAR' AS THE
'   PETITIONER IS CONCERNED.

 

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,

V' THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:



ORDER

Learned counsel for the

memo dated 13.02.2008 pr&1YiI1gv4’f9 f*dismj’ssn1§j’ <31"

writ petition as not p1vesse'c7i';L» writ

petition is dismissed not %

Sh}/~