IN THE HIGH comm OF KARNATAKA AT
DATES THIS THE 20TH DAY O_J1?,fA,VI'sI_f(D'~2'If2";"1's?i'E43..fi§;f'§'2: O:'§fiV7S3 S * ~
BEFORESS 4 1 'j 'VA
THE HON'BLE MR. JUST§.CE.__§iU¥¥U\%}\BI
M.F.A. NO. 1602 =2,Q05% (Mkv)S
M.F.A.NoS. 1503, SSSS1&:;o4S 85; _;6a5S CS;-1:' Soosmvr
BETWEEN:
1 B HMEERAELMV . " "
E310 &;Am£MS:aIfrHAzé1?A »
MAJOR --::_ S _
R,'2'x'I' 31LSUN'§::,v1LLAG.E ' '-
S:H1MScm',TQ.;«'.V
Szeumom ms'-3_'.,S ~ _ . '
- ~ - '* _ ';;_APPS1.LANT;N
» V 'MFA 510.1502/2905
2 ; HANUMATEEHA RAD
'RAVATH1'
THE'-:§_EwV1N'£>IAé.SSURANcE co LTD
MALLAPPA r.:QjMP:_.Ex-,' B H ROAD,
5 'SMMQGA ._
' ' PC{LiC1Y NO.31v,i6?0603/01859
glwgzrmg 0? THE LORRY BEARING
NQLWX '$9573
STATE'. ROAD TRANSPORT
COR'P(}RATION BY ITS DIVISIGNAL
Cf3NTi?ZOLLER, MANGALORE DEVKSION,
MAEFGALORE.
(OWNER & INSURER 0?' THE BUS BEARING
A' "«-..'N{3.KA19/R126?)
-:.z1'
H H 1:': mega S/O DEVENDRAPPA
MAJOR
IZERIVER 09' KSRTC BUS BEARING REGN.
N0'KA19,/F'. 1267
R/AT SHANTHINAGARA,
BELAVI,§{ARKALA "£'Q.,
BK. RESPONDENTS
(By S:-i : K SURAYANARAYANA RAD FOR R3:
Sr:i.D.VLEAYAKI}1’\£Al2* reap 124 g
)y_;/
3
MFAS men we 173(1) OF MV ACT A<:;A1Ns1*'._VreHE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DA'l'ED:26.Il.04 PASSED 4m_'mV
These appeals, coming :V'{7’j._’¢”3,:’}V7»:,”:’
the Court, delivered the foilojwi11g:”.__
All these four __lA:).e’u=t?i1.a..v”‘tg3l{e1″1 together
and disposeeoflbyfiuus l
V ” filed seeking for
enhancement being not satisfied with
the award ioy lthe”Add1. MACT, Shimoga in MVC
r«:os;’fi82;§e’284,% zseazéald 287 of 1996.
In so far as the negligence is
2 _ eo£1eern,ed,-«fthe tribunal ms held that there is a
W H Deemposite negligence equally on the part of the dziver of
flie”vehie1e belongilg te KSRTC and also the driver of
l ” “the vehicle belengixlg to the respondent/insured which
V U is covered with insurance pelicy. Beth are held to pay
3?”
pr (ca-5r’+;.c}v.c:Q. \}§&.e\ ,_M
£3-2 ‘C1 » _ ,
Ȥ47~.f{*;m
compensation in the ratio of 50:50 and that
illterfered with.
3. In so far as the award of;
~ ‘°r<1g_;,
N0.282/ 005 is concerned,' t:'i'i31_¥tia1
V .
Rs.20,000/– only towards xeloviole
bone and it In regard,
having regard _t_:o the another
Rs.2o,ooo/5 what has been
awarded H
MVC No.284/1996,
here middle left clavicle as well
f1.f;1ctureV”‘two elaimant would be entitled
Rs.20,00{)/ ~ over and above what
‘ has the tribunal having regard to the
nature of inj-élzéeé sufiered.
VMVC No.286/1996 olaimafit has sufiered
of ‘upper end of right fibula and he has been
‘ Rs.20,0()O/-. Having Imarcl to the age of the
llfelajmant, another Rs.30,000/- is awarded over and
above what has been g’a1:1ted by the tribunal.
W
6. In so far as MVC No.28′?/1996 is concefiigd,
claimant has suffered fracture of nasa}
awarded only Rs.15,000/- and he
another Rs.1Ei,(){)0/- towards {“w¢i4_a:.§d*
what has been awarded by t;'{;:;_’:__ V V V H
Out of the enhanced by
the KSRTC and fiémpany.
The enhanced amomt. at 6% per
mmum from _’ date of demsit.
Acc§ordi:1§5gi53.i*,V .a]1owed in part.
sd/-
IUDGE