High Court Kerala High Court

S.Prameela Kumari vs State Of Kerala on 28 November, 2008

Kerala High Court
S.Prameela Kumari vs State Of Kerala on 28 November, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 35146 of 2008(H)


1. S.PRAMEELA KUMARI
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS

                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.SREEKUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN

 Dated :28/11/2008

 O R D E R
                     P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.

                  -------------------------------

                   W.P.(C) No.35146 of 2008

                  -------------------------------

              Dated this the 28th November, 2008.

                        J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is presently working as Health

Inspector Grade-I in the Manjeri Municipality. While she was

working as Health Inspector Grade II, she was promoted as

Health Inspector Grade I and transferred to and posted in the

Thiruvalla Municipality in February, 2008. Later, at the time of

general transfer, by Ext.P1 order dated 9.5.2008, she was

transferred to and posted as Health Inspector Grade I in the

Manjeri Municipality. The petitioner submits that retirement

vacancies of Health Inspector Grade I will arise shortly in Kollam

Corporation and Attingal Municipality and that in Kollam

Corporation, yet another vacancy will arise on the promotion of

Sri.Sukumaran Pillai as Food Inspector. The petitioner submits

that seeking transfer and posting to any one of the said

vacancies, she has submitted Ext.P4 representation to the

Director of Urban Affairs, the second respondent herein. In this

W.P.(C) No.35146 of 2008

2

writ petition, the petitioner prays for a direction to the Director of

Urban Affairs to consider the request made by her in Ext.P4

representation and pass orders thereon, within a time limit to be

fixed by this Court.

2. The pleadings disclose that in a span of about

three months, the petitioner was transferred twice. The

petitioner belongs to Thiruvananthapuram District. She has in

Ext.P4 representation requested the second respondent to

transfer and post her in the retirement vacancies that will arise

in Kollam/Attingal, or in the vacancy that will arise in the Kollam

Corporation due to the promotion of Sri.Sukumaran Nair.

Whether the vacancies as claimed by the petitioner will arise or

have arisen, and whether the petitioner can be accommodated

against any one of the said vacancies is primarily a matter for

the second respondent to decide, at least in the first instance.

However, as the petitioner has already moved the second

respondent in that regard, I feel that the request made by the

petitioner should be considered by the second respondent.

W.P.(C) No.35146 of 2008

3

In these circumstances, I dispose of the Writ

Petition with a direction to the second respondent to consider the

request made by the petitioner in Ext.P4 representation before

the retirement vacancies/promotion vacancies, if any, arising in

Kollam Corporation/Attingal Municipality are filled up. Needless

to say, the claims of others who are eligible shall also be

considered.

P.N.RAVINDRAN,
JUDGE

nj.