Mohammed Ameer vs The Asst Commissioner Bangalore … on 7 August, 2008

HGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HlGH §l0i;£RT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA i-ilGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH (

Mgw
II'TlE IIGI C051! 0! I3RllMIlI.3E ELIGLDIE
D.?:.TEIh 'E'HIS THE *3" DAY OF AUGUST 2008

BEFORE

mm I-I{.¥ifi"BLE an. JUSTICE 2:.3rIzaKI'rIzav2a*3}é:=si;=b;L:----: 

933:1' .'iE'1'I'I'IGN No.519C§{2i'._2=06 '.'{':;R.:'fj-.""f "

BE'1'WEEfiE

'sun--an-.o--.un-uap

1 HQHAMMED AMEER
sis LATE MB. naaas «_ .
REES A303? 53 YRS. _m__F
we ncmyemn  PPL{.sYJP~.,' _  _
vsaaanxxn HcnLx,'aANsA;b3E HQRT3flV

2 nemmnnsn A£m3Acx£fi"=g _ . - ,
sin LATE"E3wHfiBEA3i*' "F'«'«--
Assn A£daT?§§:?n5_',. 5 iv
EKG Maamxfign sAH§3y?AL¥A'¢'=
VELAERNKK'fiQBLI,"EAHGR§GRE HORH

3 namnMEn'3aL3uunzfi=.*
AsEn»fi£nuT=4?¢vns2_'
R30 H5H%HMEB_SRHEE"PhL¥E
r5u3Hmmxfi_ac3L:; BANGRLGRE yearn

... PETITIONERS

°.§h$ Sn: 3 b sfisunsaan, Anv.:

VF_1:F?HE ASST conxzssznxsx
T."'EAHfihbGRE NGRTH'$UB EIVIEION
KAHGALGRE

'°» '2 H RAMAKRIEHRAIAH

MRJGR RIB RA3'CEGQlfRbEPuPAL'!'A
YEMEEIQKR KOBE}



IIGI-1 COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH  OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA I-SGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C

EAHQHLGRE HORTH

3 Ti-IE 10-'kR!I3A'3"fis}G"u. APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

H3 HUI LDIHG, BAIJGRLGRE
REF 3? CI~§&IRI>53'3.1*l

4 namamzu us:-ma

we LATE 1513. Angus

man was? 51 'ms  
areas 953.3 ms' ms: 15:31-nar1»mr:.~r:»:£;s;au.'
Pu'.-3E§ ABOUT 34 was   

ram mt-mama SAHEE PALYA,  
YELPEKNKK 'HOBLI 7

BMIGMQRE ޣ3R'I'i'I

5 Ho:-w-man ISMML

3;-'0 LATE rm. sagas A

NEED ABOUT 45  -_

MRJGR   _  »
FJO rxmmmn Sm-IE.E_f?ALYA.V.. "
*:m..».I-wzm..Hc:V§LI    
amaantzmxjv     "   

6 Hmmrmn  
s;'g..::..;:wv.-:_*§.1_~s;tz."1--:;I;;1_::;.>s;"  ' " «
mm mr:;w{;=a,

Lmmwm mam
B3s£%'5£iLf3RE NZJRTH

; ~~--:

. . . RESPONEHTS

  T"7_:E*{_ SR': A391,}; RE':'3£Z}€E-EAR R, ABE man 314,

Vss1=.1"°M:RAav.::ni>AL,A::u: marzswa 3'3,
ER} RBsA sImH,2mP FDRR1 a Rsa

O  ""53;<z "H 5 m&  Arm: rm R2)



IIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HlGH §0£f1;RT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA I-HGH COURT OF XARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH (

?'H'IS WRIT PE'I'I'?ION I3 FILE}? UNDER ARTICLES
225 E 22'?" GE' 'PE-IE CGKSTITUTION OF INDIA PRRYING TD
QUASH 'I'!-=.l'E ORDER OF THE THERE RESPGNBENT HT.
2Q..2.2fiOfi IR HPERL HG.1219;'2U03 VIBE P:!*3N$Eu_}\,
CDHSEQUERTLY QUASH Wm GRQER €31? R}. IN' 

HQ.€83}!lé3f1§9§--96 nv. s.12.20e2 VIEE ANNEX1S;OxOa

$315 sarzrxon commas em you 9gfiLxgififimf*O*
mmm5m'wGmw,mmnm,mn@@fimm~

THE FCILLQWING:
axasgl

The petitionezia.  :g:'ra:;:..c$r:.gd%:;3.t;A;;,=§-4 to
'I are children caf patitianera
ans befrzura th:'.5s  226 5: 22'?
at the   ta quash
the o;dg;V'fl$§gfiRO$;i2;$Q§2 mafia in LR?
N:3.33.fii...43'.5.O§.?g:_:Z*s13{iG.¥§Xu.rfi*'G' on the file

5215 firs'rf°._  O and the order dated

%__2c.gg;¢§sk m$d§OW;g Appeal Nm.1219/2093, at

 an the file of Karnataka

g§§§m1até3::i§una1.

AA   Learned counsel fear the petitioners

 that the petiticanars are absolute

""v.V§§-"u~'z'I1e.*:5 of the property in question and the

yzvgerty waa sold by their father: I-Id. Abbas



IIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH §0URT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH (

4

,5? M
withJont their knawladge and tharefaxe the

patitione rs - have filed a. suit in

€}.S.I1T=:3.35'?CH'93 011 tzha file of the City
Jucige at Bangalore City,  .
purchasers viz . , G. S ..h   " "
D.H.F;amakrishr1aiah, ma Ghc-u:;5Aa 

B.K.Rama13.r:a; the <;~:::.i.agi':;4V;_;-::'.?L_ p1i:=cV:11aaFa':fVF:'éV.VT11e

suit came to be  t.1'.ia~T. :T:'OOF£11iCfil
ground. As  has been
filed by the  :se;.con:=:i"  is also
aubmi timed    respondent' 5

appeal C£t33.11′:t and
rwzanfiéd -. ‘ ‘ ‘Fro the Aasiatant

Coz°mis3i<z~72:.g1:,_ Hearth Sub-division to

_._..ret:ozi§id«ar t:he,__ma_*.:ter in the case hearing

A'=._%Nu{;1.1¢;.;?.,§3,.*–1,A:§'s3.g*95.-96, the appeal preferred by

tF§m:".~-.pfiVé%?=éiv:;1t'Aj:.Vfiatitianars maxi their brothers

gviz..ug' ..rié§y$'rz%;11:ientaa~4 try '? hezzein was dimuisaed.
'Ties; fiiso submitted that the potitianars am

–.T.’.–e§1f£::ii.F:ied ta: have a good grmzad to pzzove that

are the: abs-alute aewners of the property

in queatizan.

av

IIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH OF KARNATAKA HiGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COEIRT OF KARNATAKA I-IEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C

Mg”

miajeindar cf the parties or rather gronmis

urged by the petitioners.

6. In the reault, the petitifi’-3%””‘3;_g..:f

fiismissad as hearing become in£3:;;¢tucus”.”**
3% coats.

Leemnad Gavt. §3;s;§da1’*W time
weeks ta: file mmen cf

‘amp!-‘