High Court Kerala High Court

Muhammed Rasheed vs The State Of Kerala on 22 May, 2009

Kerala High Court
Muhammed Rasheed vs The State Of Kerala on 22 May, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 1555 of 2009()


1. MUHAMMED RASHEED,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. P.N. GOPINATHAN,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :22/05/2009

 O R D E R
             M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.

              ==================
              Crl.M.C. No. 1555 of 2009
              ==================
         Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2009.


                       O R D E R

The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.150/2006

on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II,

Punalur. He was convicted and sentenced to simple

imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of

Rs.3,33,333/- and in default, simple imprisonment for

6 months more for the offence under Section 138 of

the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner filed

Crl.Appeal No.131/2009 challenging the conviction.

Crl.M.P.No.1038/2009 was filed to suspend the

sentence. Under Annexure 2 order, learned Sessions

Judge suspended the sentence on the petitioner

executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- with 2 solvent

sureties for the like sum and on depositing 1/6th of the

amount covered by the dishonoured cheque within

one month. This petition is filed to quash the

CRL.M.C.No.1555/2009
2

direction to deposit the amount in Annexure 2 order.

2. The learned Counsel appearing for the

petitioner was heard.

3. Though the learned Counsel argued that the

direction to deposit a portion of the cheque amount is

to be quashed, I am not inclined to grant the relief. If

the petitioner is to get the sentence suspended, he

has to deposit the amount as directed by the learned

Sessions Judge. In case petitioner is to raise the

amount, he is permitted to furnish sufficient bank

guarantee or other security to the satisfaction of the

Magistrate within one month.





                            M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
dkr                                      JUDGE