Saravana @ Kuruvi S/O Sundaram vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 March, 2009

{By M/_s§:3 a;_4"s IXSSIGCIIITEIS, ABVS.)(ABSEN'I')

  BY co-zf:oI;,P.9:ifE'P0LIcE STATION _ . , R:»3:s1>0}II,;IE:i{I:
'A :;-j€.B'Ir Sri. B.E3A_.¥$AKRISHNA, HCGP}
    CRLP IS FILE9 U/5.439 (3R.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE

.  MAY;: 31¢; PLEASED TO ENLARGE ma PETE. on am, IN
  _ ۤRL.NQ.357/G4 op CO'I"I'ONPET 93., WHICH IS REGD. FOR THE
 "'o§«*FEN{::I*;s P/U/8.30'? ()9 IPC.

i....J

CRL. PIIjI§. [2098
IN THE HIGH comm 0:? KARNATAKA AT    
DATED THIS THE 2nd DAY {}F"P»4IfiRC}'IIIé{Iér9'     
THE HOIWBLE Dr.  BIIAI%j'§%AV;I%fSA'LA 
CRIMINAL QETITIQMIILJ'§I.:§.35fz3/é'c>4c»3,'_ 
BETWEEN V  T 'V  "
SARAVANA@ KURUVI  j; 'V
3/0 SUNQARAM    I V

AGED ABOUT 32 Iyagms .
No.14, 3.5? CRC-:1*SS_'~, 

RANASINQH PET§;;[g  

COTTQNPETE', _ ' _    1.

BANGALORE-560 053.  _ ...P}3'fI"f'}'iONER
(NOWEN J/(3)  . 

THE ~ Sfizrfi ' 61:" -- KEIQIATAKA

F¢'I7}R":THE PETZTIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON°BLE COURT'

This Criminal Petition coming on for orders, this day, the:
Court made the fo}.io'I.ving:~

 



IN}

CRL.P.Na.3f;§?3/f2VC¥1Q8:' ft   .

ORDER

There is no myresentation for tb.€?V1}&.tVi§§01i£:r. 2

2. The petition is dismissed’ {gr noziéprfisefiufion. « ‘

.

X«X Iu&g%
bnv*