IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.23158 of 2011
Chandan Pathak
Versus
The State Of Bihar
-----------
03. 24.10.2011 Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case initially
lodged under section 379 IPC. Two days thereafter section 411
was added. It appears that the stolen truck and the laden milk
powder packets were found in the premise/factory belonging to
the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
aforesaid premise/factory was handed over for its management
to one Pappu Turi under agreement. The agreement appears to
have been entered into between Papu Turi and petitioner along
with Sunil Kr. Singh and Ajay Kr. Singh on 27.8.2010. It
appears that one of the party to the agreement is another co-
accused. This Court, for grant of anticipator bail, does not feel it
appropriate to rely on the said documents.
The application is dismissed.
If the petitioner appears and pray for bail in the court
below, the same shall be considered on its own merit
unprejudiced by the present order.
( Kishore K. Mandal )
hr