High Court Kerala High Court

V.Krishna Pillai vs Union Of India on 2 January, 2007

Kerala High Court
V.Krishna Pillai vs Union Of India on 2 January, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

OP No. 4262 of 2001(G)



1. V.KRISHNA PILLAI
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. UNION OF INDIA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.P.SATHEESAN, SC FOR CBI

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :02/01/2007

 O R D E R
                                      S. SIRI JAGAN, J.

                         ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

                                 O.P. No. 4262 OF 2001 G

                         ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

                        Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2007


                                       J U D G M E N T

Petitioner’s daughter, who was married to one Ajith Kumar, died at

Sarsawa, Sharanpur. Obviously the case is one of suicide. The petitioner

alleges that this is a dowry death. He cites the undue haste shown by the

husband in cremating the dead body of petitioner’s daughter as a reason for

his suspicion. The petitioner submits that since the marriage between his

daughter and Ajith Kumar was only 5 years old, the case was one for an

investigation for unnatural death. The petitioner, therefore, seeks a direction

to the 2nd respondent to conduct an investigation into the unnatural death of

the daughter of the petitioner. However, for the present, the petitioner would

be satisfied with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of

Exts.P2 and P3, as expeditiously as possible.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the

learned Assistant Solicitor General.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, there would be a direction

to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exts.P2 and

P3, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall forward a

certified copy of the judgment along with copies of Exts.P2 and P3 to the 1st

respondent for due compliance.

(S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE)

aks

S. SIRI JAGAN , J.

OP No.4262/01 G

J U D G M E N T

2nd January, 2007