Shri Anjenappa vs Thasildhar on 5 September, 2008

  " '

xx rm: man comm' or KARHATAKA AT    

Dated this the 5"" day of  *'    
BEFORE A '_ V % A %
ms HOIPBLE MR. &x:s!r zcnA'H   

 

Writ Petition No; 1.1o72£5f 

BETWEEN:    % 

Shri Anjenappa  "" W'
8/0 Nagappa j__ " 

Aged abuut 5SV3{ca3§_is =_ '
R/atBasaVvax1kétcT,L'JilIag;c  _ '
JagaiurTa1uk~ ' V   %    _
Davangere I}istrk:t '  '    " ...Pctittonc.r

  V Pinto, Advocate}

   Jagalur Taluk ' ' L: 
" 'Z3avaug"é.-~.--re I}i:5i:ri<':t ...Respondent

» Smt. Asha Kumbargczimath, HCGP)

Wnlt Petition is firm under Articics 226 and 227 of
fhc Consfitution of India. praying to dimct the respondent to
“»»£n:£t:iate pmoeefljnga 03:1 the basis of the application dated

9-4-2007 filed by that petitioner and pnxiuued as Anuuxun:-A

k/

is a very poor man and, therefore, he made a _

Tahsikiar to Iegularize his unauthoxized ” =

steps are taken petitioner has preferreej in} : f

3. Annexme-A elearly the the
petitioner has been The
petitioner clajmg occupant of
the said land. ‘§g’hé:;ef¢re,:1–.pei;iie’i§3n’e£:::i$,éisveg fight. If the land
belongs to over to the Formt
Depa1’t3:1«;.*:v1’3′;f–,VTv be granted to the
P¢1itionexV* ix;” am; of the Apex Court in the
case of xmomzmw as mm our

is next a case fa}I1n’ g under Section

take Land Revenue Act and, therefbre, no

apfiIi.»<:':m«:i<3;v1« prescribed form as contemplated under the

is filed. Under these circumstances, when the

jjefifianer has no right he the land in quesmvn, the authorities

* itijiéler no crbligatien to consider the zmumt of the petitioner

" pass appropriate orders. In that View of the matter, no

ck}.

wxit of mandmnus can be granted. Hcnoc, the
dismissed. ‘ M’ N %