High Court Kerala High Court

M/S Devi Jewel Collections vs Union Of India Represented By The on 13 July, 2007

Kerala High Court
M/S Devi Jewel Collections vs Union Of India Represented By The on 13 July, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 8876 of 2007(F)


1. M/S DEVI JEWEL COLLECTIONS, 27/3006A,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. P.R.SUDHAKARAN, PANIKKASSERY HOUSE,
3. T.D.DEVI, W/O SUBIN,

                        Vs



1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. UCO BANK, KAVERI BUILDINGS,

3. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER UNDER SARFAESI

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SIBY MATHEW

                For Respondent  :SRI.VARGHESE P. THOMAS, CGSC

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :13/07/2007

 O R D E R
                          S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
                  -----------------------------------
                     W.P.(C)NO.8876 OF 2007
                ---------------------------------------
           DATED THIS THE 13th DAY OF JULY, 2007

                              JUDGMENT

The petitioners challenge proceedings under the Securitisation

and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security

Interest Act, 2002. By order dated 16.3.2007, this Court stayed

further proceedings on condition that the petitioners deposit 40% of

the impugned outstanding on or before 30.3.2007 and continue to

deposit at the rate of 10% of the total outstanding per month, payable

on or before the last working day of every month commencing from

April, 2007. It is admitted by the petitioners that they have not

complied with the said interim order.

2. The Act itself prescribes a remedy by way of appeal before

the Debt Recovery Tribunal against the impugned proceedings. The

Supreme Court of India has held that this Court shall not ordinarily in

exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

interfere with the proceedings under the Act. The petitioners have not

been able to show any special reasons which would warrant

interference of this Court also.

In the above circumstances, I decline to entertain this writ

W.P.(c)No.8876/07 2

petition and accordingly, the same is dismissed.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

Acd