Sri Shivakumar vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 January, 2009

., .,....... .. .................-. nlun \..vuIn ur cuumnmlm HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 3:934

 

m 'rim HIGH coum GP' KARNATMQA arr 

mama 'fi~IIS "mm scam my 09    5  '   

EEFGRB;"""« L _ 
'rim E-IOI*I'ELE WW , "
cmflaz.    

1.

S1i3M — _
Agedabaut 3’9Ayear3′ 1 2 .
Sfc:.Ex?£uni3.r’t3n1%~gata3Jp.Eg ”

R] at .

II Crass’?

Va;h55′.*.

Aged a’is=¢u*: 26
S! ‘-

R3-_! s.t”E’Iumb§sh§qg.r;a Iiflaya

‘V .,€}¢;;AKnc_’§agappa
‘ . “Ha.£5{2fi,”5’*’*’Cms3

H ” . Kadufgc’i;E’;:§’,. Ban%re~5t§fi $36. ….PE”I”ITIII23I5IERS
J % 1 (By 933:: ? Aahak Hagar Police St&&z1.,, S%E§ENT

V (By S:-i P.M.Nawaz, Addi. SPF)

T’.§1is crmfiinai pet:i’!:§3:m is flfi 2.x.f:5.438 E.”.’;1:.F.C
prayizgteenlargestluegetitiexm asnbaiifiitheemaiaof
their arztmt ‘m Cr.§9.,%”r/€33 $1’ $3hfl Bofiba

– y_1–.’:vII-r– ‘ill nrlnlwl-Qirnnll I’1I\)l” \.\)UK’ U!’ HAKNAIAKA

Station, which is rwktmwd fer the afiicnee

zm. If

This petition Gaming’ cm. £2131 9% ‘. ”

Court made the fmllowimz

R1123

……..-.-.-.m…………_…………….._.

The pafitinnma their
emplaym am ¥s:1;.;:,§1*:;:é..:;:§f£’-‘tRa.2§58,85’E’]~.

As per ‘Cm warlcing in
Health and’ §n.V%29.1.2ms at about
tha storm, produced
flfir cash at’ Rs.2,,58,,85′.?/-

uakg They have mt demsitsd the

%nk., T115 pefitimnma have left

thair whmmfimuw am mt knawn.

‘

2.j mk W” ms tha alhgafiozzs made aga1n’ at

, mmhzséial 1xmerr:::’ gafinsn caxmt be derued’ to
u _ –‘ ameert.//Ifhws: is ten mamial an rworcl
‘ petitionm-5 have human faisefy fimpliaatuad, Thai,

discmtian under Seaman 438 Cr.F.=C. csammt be

.r\:.c£~”~’-/”””””‘”L'”w