Dr.Saraswathi V Kapali vs The Registrar on 24 February, 2010

 

TI-VHS PETITION COMING ow FOR PRLY. 

GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE :, 1 

ORDER.  _

The petitioner is cailing in tjues--tion the .order 

4.11.2009 passed by the 13' resipondentj isfirripugned
at Annexure -- H to the :'petitio.r1'§"' *  T T V

2. The contention..pu_t::afor'thpetiitioner is that as
per the order   Annexure--G, the
petitioner   of Linguistics
as a  per week as indicated
thereirih The  petitioner in this petition is

that by Annexure--.H, theivisaid order dated 09.09.2009 was

 «.rnodified":tre--ating thiempetitioner as Guest Faculty, instead of

 It is in that context, the petitioner is

bafpfé thisicaxilrt.

 ..   is also to be noticed at this stage that this Court

driterim order dated 15.12.2009 had directed the

 _,respondents to treat the petitioner as Teaching Assistant

without prejudice to the rights of the parties. When the

4

“M