High Court Kerala High Court

P.V.Pappachan vs K.Padmanabhan

Kerala High Court
P.V.Pappachan vs K.Padmanabhan
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 10117 of 2007(D)


1. P.V.PAPPACHAN,AGED 45 YEARS,PROPRIETOR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. K.PADMANABHAN,AGED 46 YEARS,S/O.MADHAVAN
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.I.DANIEL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :/  /

 O R D E R
                P.R.RAMAN & ANTONY DOMINIC, JJ.

                ========================

                      W.P(C) NO.10117 OF 2007

                  ======================

              Dated this the 23rd day of March, 2007


                               J U D G M E N T

P.R.Raman, J.

The petitioner is a tenant, who is faced with an order of

eviction passed under Section 11(2)(b), 11(3) and 11(8) of Kerala

Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. As against the order of

eviction passed by the Rent Control Court, he has already

preferred an appeal and pending. Since there was some arrears of

rent due from the petitioner, stay application filed before the

Appellate Authority was admittedly dismissed. But by Ext.P2

proceedings dated 19/2/2007, the Appellate Authority directed

the petitioner to deposit the admitted arrears and the case is

posted to 9/4/07. It was in the meantime that the Execution

proceedings at the instance of landlord was proceeded with and

the matter is posted to 27/3/2007. Aggrieved by such

circumstances, the petitioner has come before this Court by filing

this writ petition. In the view we are taking,it is not necessary to

issue notice to the other side. Since by Ext.P2 proceedings, the

WPC 10117/2007

: 2 :

Appellate Authority has adjourned the appeal to 9/4/07 directing

the petitioner herein to deposit the arrears of rent, it is open to

the petitioner herein to make such deposit on or before the said

date and seek necessary relief from the Appellate Authority

regarding stay of Execution Proceedings. So as to enable the

petitioner herein to deposit the arrears of rent and to work out his

remedies as stated above, we direct that the Execution

Proceedings in E.P.42/07 in RCP 112/04 on the file of Munsiff

Court, Ernakulam be deferred till 10/4/07 and thereafter the

matter will be governed by any orders that may be passed by the

Appellate Authority.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.

Rp