High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Baldeo Mahto & Ors. vs The State Of Bihar on 14 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Baldeo Mahto & Ors. vs The State Of Bihar on 14 September, 2011
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr. Misc. No.27167 of 2011
                 1. Baldeo Mahto son of Late Ganesh Prasad Singh,
                 2. Ram Tapesh Mahto son of Late Sheo Jatan Mahto,
                 3. Rajendra Mahto son of Late Butai Mahto,
                 4. Jitendra Mahto son of Ramdeep Mahto,
                 5. Lailoon Mahto son of Late Ramadhar Mahto,
                 6. Bageshwar Mahto son of Dinanath Mahto,
                 7. Goras Mahto son of Late Ramadhar Mahto,
                 8. Budhan Mahto @ Budhan Sao son of Masudan Sao,
                 9. Vidya Mahto son of Ranjit Mahto @ Ramjit Mahto &
                 10. Binesari Mahto son of Ramashish Mahto           ...Petitioners
                                        Versus
            The State Of Bihar                                               ...OP
                                       -----------

2/ 14.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted

for the offence under sections 147, 148, 149, 342, 323, 307, 337,

379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that there was counter version

with regard to the same occurrence and now the parties have

compromised between themselves.

In view of such, in the event of surrender of the

petitioners, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt

of a copy of this order in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No.2 of

2011, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand) each with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Jehanabad, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438 (2)

Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he

is related with the petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish

information to the court about any change in the address of the
2

petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the

petitioners are not an accused in any other case and, if they are, they

shall not be released on bail and further the petitioners shall

undertake to be represented on the first date after cognizance if the

investigation in the case is still pending and in case they fail to do

so, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled (iii) That the bailors

shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned

if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature

after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below

will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on

the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will give an

undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date

and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on

two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be

liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (v) That the

petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to

do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

JA/-                                            (Anjana Prakash,J.)