Shree Vaishnavi Printers Pvt Ltd vs Nil on 25 November, 2009

IN1}HBHKHiCOURT(fl?KARNKDflfl&KTBANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE  M0H1'n'U?EI3i:)YA  "

COMPANY APPLICATION NO.A7'§,O33;gOO9   '  O. 

COMPANY PETITION NO.64'OF 199?. _ 
BETWEEN: ' V' V Q V "
M/SSHREE VAISHNAVI ERIm'ERSV_RVT, L7"ID.., (IN LIQN),
REPRESENTED BY OEFICmL~I.1guT--D;,ATOR, I 
HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA  A  
CORPORATE BHAVAN, 1,2'rH" EI,OOR,jRA.. EJA' TOWERS,
N0.26--27,M.G:RQA'D,  ,    §
BANGALOREr560:f'g0h1_A_. .1     _..APPLICANT.

{SRL DEEPAEV &}S'RT. If JAIKARAM,' FOR OL)
AND:  '-- '

1 __NIL      ...RESPONDENT.

 COMPANIE APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION

   ..CQMPANIES ACT, 1956 READ WITH RULES 1100)
AND' 298  COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1956 PRAYING

TO'~..AP}?OiN'i"' AN AUDITOR TO AUDIT THE ACCOUNTS OF THE

 OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDINO 31«03~
 V. E009 AND FIX RIS REMUNERATION AND TO PASS ORDERS AS
 THE REQUIREMENT OE SECTEON 462(5) OF THE

'  f{',0MPA§\§IES ACT, 1956. L.'



THIS CA COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: V. 

ORDER

Auditofs report is accepted hi_s”i°ee’::’i.s “fixed

terms of the order dated 3 Em’

No.21 1/2007. The requiretfienfi uiidei’ v

the Companies Act, 1956 is

Company Vapp1icetV_iv():rA1VV ‘_

“”” ‘C

KS ,