Karnataka High Court
Dr S J Rajalakshmi vs Mr Umesh, The Secretary on 27 January, 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN GALORE
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 201foff~ECv
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.JUsT1CE»+Av_C.sAEEA§;1i*
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTiC}§
CCC N0.596g2Dd9{C1V1L) T
BETWEEN
DR.s.J.RAJAE4'a1§$HE§1 §
D /o LATE.S;'JA1\IARD4." _ VA
AGED AB0U'r*2,3
REP BY EMO'"i'_ " DE,s,sHCEEA
R/A 1\io.295,A-E3 I
11 KRISHNA R()AD',~-- GIRINAGAR
BANGALOI2E--56G-L085'-..__"
T . . 4 ...coMPLA1NAN'1'
- (BE Dr.S'.'J«.RAJALAKsHM1, PARTY-IN-PERSON)
1. n-:ir;UExEsH
THE SECRETARY
A : DEEARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION
vlm-IANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE
DLARUNA
THE DIRECTOR
MEEICAL EDUC,A'I'i0N
ANAND RAD CIRCLE
BANGALORE»-560 002
DT.VASANTHKUMAR
THE REGISTRAR
RAJEEV GANDHI UNIVERSITY
OF HEALTH SCIENCES
JAYANAGARA. BANGALORE
Mr.ANEEs SIRAJ A ;
THE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY '
DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL "ED'UCATIQ5\I..,
VIKASA SOUDI-IA
BANGALORE-560 001
Mr.RAMANANDA'-A " '
vICE--CHANCELLoRV I
RAJEEV .GANDHI"UNIVER$ITY I I' '
OF
JAYANACARA, 'BANGALORE ,
Dr..JAGADIsIH_ 1.
THE REC(}IsT:RAR'~EvALIiATIoN
RAJEEEV 'GANDH'I.u'I+II'vERsITY
OF HEALTH --GEN'-I_'_RE'
JAYANAAGARA;._vBANGAL0RE
. AHMED
" THEJQINT DIRECTOR
- " INIEDICAL EDUCATION
._ %.AN{ANDARAo CIRCLE
g' ' BANGALoRE~56o 002
MI';NAGARAJ
THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
»_ 1" MEDICAL EDUCATION AND HEALTH 8:
A FAMILY WELFARE
ANANDA RAO CIRCLE
BANGALOREJ560 O02
DLRAMACHANDRA
THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH AND
FAMILY WELFARE SERVICES
ANANDA RAO CIRCLE
BANGALORE~560 002
(BY SRI V S HEGDE. AGA FOR A-1, 2, 4j&...?éfTiO7T9) 3
THIS CCC IS FILED 'U/S:=,_'11:-«.éA'NIj",,>1:2_.'
CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT PRAYING To, }:NITL';YI'E''~.
.. .A€cI:SEDI
CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS' AGAINST' THE"ACCUS';ED
FOR DISOBEYING THE ORDER I3A'l'ED, 3,.8'.2oo9
PASSED IN W.P.N0.18261/2009 ATANNEXURE-A
AND ORDER P,ASSED""" 'reS'en't..;bIeVi'oI:*ethe Court and submits that an order
1]Ii':I$_r']i)Cev_'l'.l"x':PEEESC(i today [27.1.2010} in compliance
direction issued by this Court and copy of
v~I_"§he"S.ame has been Served upon Dr.S.Shobha, mother
Wgf the complainant, who is appearing in person.
\;LJ>.
2. I)r.S.Shobha. mother of the complainant
submits that in View of the order passed..'toda5r,
there is compliance of the direction issued ~
Court and it is unnecessary to gproceed--'_'furt1'1-er i'uf1;V11e.., it
matter.
3. Under the"*cp_ircurnst.a;nVc'es, hav'in'g'V4 regard
to the counter affidavit .i'1jespondent No.1
today, we aafe"§.atisfi_ed tfiat» necessary to
proceed Accordingly,
complaint is disposedpp Respondents are
discharged.
.H5EK3E
$éje
§?§§$§.Z