IN THE HIGH COURT OF KAZRNATAKA AT BANGALQR 15:
DATED THIS THE 30?" DAY OF JULY, :é--10%%%'T
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. ]UsT1c,E H.N.4'ms %' %
CA.No.6S2QO1O IN ¢o13_.;gp.166/2t}o1
BETWEEN: 2 M H
Sri SAIL BKOLIWAD % . A
s/0 BASAVANNfE£iPA_'KOL;I\NAD.«i -.
AGEDABOUT..S:2YEAR_3.. % M
R/O SRINAGAR, --_ " . "
G.P.A.HQ_LDER ox". T313 142=s_Tp;1a . Q :
' spm AND Tw1s{}'1MAi:jHI1s1E1§"{ _
WORKERSUNEON.w':"-.. '
= * ' " ..APPLICANT
(By 537;; M .G.C6r$rBACTO1R, Ai)V.,)
'f};fi"OFF:Ci;§;L ijIQU1DAT0R 5;
M/S"MYSOR;?;KIRLOSKAR 131)., ( L3jQN.,)
' ' RAHEIA TOWERS, MG. ROAD,
H k L H BAZ\§GAI;ORE--560 om.
RESPONDENT
, __(By 53:: K.S.MAHADEVAN 3: VJAYARAM, ADVS.)
!””””‘-u
7%
‘*6
§’\J
THIS APPLICATION FILED UNDER RULES 6 8: 9
COMPANY COURT RULES, 1956, PRAYWG TO ISSUE DIRECSIONS
TO THE RESPONDENT TO TAKE GENERAL 1:>o\Is[ERf”L~<._o'I'A'
ATTORNEY HOLDERS IDENTIFICATION AT THE;""FI1\[iE.__: of 5
ISSUING CHEQUE AND ETC. _.
This application coming on for :o:Hers«:hi.s day.,iVi”theV cotirt
made the following;
In this application,’ appiiicanti l1.as,prI’Aayed for a direction
to the Official Liquidator to «accept Power” o’f’iAttorney in his
favour and to issue cfhe.ques”r_elating* v142,iworl<ers, The Official
Liquidalfir C'PPiC55iéSV–«st_h'ei .0 the ground that it requires
identification of eiachii;w'oVrl{:man before issuing the cheques.
V. A_ Furtlier copy'iof*Pow_e.:' of Attorney produced before the Court
M_a'I'chTiZ00:(5.'*..NoW we areiin 2010. It is not stated in the
appl.i,§iation.as' what is the true fact and the developments that
10""-__i"hadj talcertiplace between 2006 and 2010. In the circumstances,
a._ithie"'a;5plication is hereby rejected. However, the concerned
"eirxployees are entitled to draw the money from the Official
'7a'é~/'
Liquidator by producing necessary documents and establishing._ ".__
their claim.
sd/- j
DKB