Miss Prarthana B vs Devaraj Urs University on 3 February, 2010

 

IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALQR-E

f.)A'I'EI') TI"-I1S'1'E--IE 3% DAY OF ;?;<:z3;2uA_I{¥l'_}2tj_:£11';   .

BEFORE

THE HoN'BLI3 MR. JUs'rIcE7,_s.  

WRIT PETITION No.2ra.1_55/2'oQ9  ::

BETVVEIEN :

Miss Prarthana B

Aged 20 yeews

D/(). T. Bisse Gowcia V   - 

No.441. 8!"   =:   A ' 

4"' Main' RMTVEI S'_Lag_e = ' _ }    .

Bangalore ~:i'56o.'"@9"4'--. .     .... JPETITIONER

(By Sn'  K;  AtI~fl)'

AND :

1. ;Sri.LADe\/uam'jVU1;s U m'vers£ty
_" '5T1'a:n_'1'a1kua. KGiE1'I'...--....553 1 O 1
 Rep' ~E.f';s Registrar

 J  T 'CQVI1FLvi'Q}.!E*€I' of Exa'minat.ion

A '=.Sr1'. [}:%Iff.<a1f}:1j U1':-3 U11iv<:=rsit:y
.__'I'21m~akaj..--
K_§)1;é3.!a' -9 563 101  RESPONDENTS

K   Naliak 81 Nail: Law Firm. Adm.)



 ciostsi " V'

This Writ Petition is tiled under Articles 226 8: 227 of
the Constitution of lnctia. praying to direct the respondents

to send the M388 1 phase. Physiology part--l paper ol7T'tjhe

petitioner and etc.

This Writ Petition coming on for Orders  V.

Court made the following:

ORDER

Learned Counsel for the re:_=p’o*:1dent,. has rftenio

stating that during the pen.:te’i’iey’ ofthte wfit .p’e»’€’;it’.ion, relevant.

statute has ‘Ll”.1._t’–t:;:j&’3t’l”1’e-,VViljenefit of the said
a1I1endn1ent.tfvill..

2. 1,~ktVe”~ef_t1bsequent. developments. the
writ’ petfiioii eonsidermion and it is

aeeo.rdingly disritigsedvl’asl-having become infruetuous. No