High Court Karnataka High Court

Bangalore Metropolitan … vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 14 January, 2011

Karnataka High Court
Bangalore Metropolitan … vs The Deputy Labour Commissioner on 14 January, 2011
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
IN '}'H.I£ H:1(;H C()UR'i" OF KA RNATA KA AT
BAN(}AL()RE 

I)ATEI) THIS THE 14"' my OF J'AN'UAR_};7. ~ 

B EF 0 RE

Tm: H()N'BLE MR. JUSTICE HIDLQVAi)I.(}gR:Al\2i§E'gSk{' :'

REVIEW PE1'I'I'I()N N0.4.1i:'..()I<' 2{F!}!9"1N w.P¢:g;OQ12:;s3*
OF A   

BETWEEN:

Bangalore .Met:"()p()1imn. V V
Trz11.1sp01"E C01'p(.)rz1t.io11,  
Cenirai Offi<:6,;     
K.H.R0ad, Bz,1.n'---;.g;.1!cjrg3;_" ~ '

By its  " 

Represg:nt.ed by?;if._;s  O_fT'fice1'. ...PETlTIONER
( B y S mf;¥fi.P._. Rcmfi l<§.;5i'; .A"dV ~ A  

1.

The Deputy £,,z1E:rc3i}1′ Cf(‘)n§:’nEssi.()ne-1’

;-_1»:1~i;i the AppealPixie,A_uth0rit.y under

., A V ilk: pi1§}:n.<é:1§ 01" G1";-*:tué1'y Act,

' 'B–a.11g:1_il(.);,-. I§'c—gion–] .

. "§{.:11"A:I':'3L-311;; E3.Im%v"211),

I {Q

' AB§inncI_fg'i*xzi;_:.tai Road,

B"ang:£il<):"c1"

The”.:’\§Es=is1za1at. C01″:troEling Authority
‘ é-i:<1§:i Assistzmt L£'1b(')LH' C0n'm1is;si(_m<:t1'.

V " f)E_3}isi13 II, 1’ Floozf, _I_<Zz:.1'mik;-2 lfihawzzrsa,

Bzmn€1'g}1z1t.ia1 R:1<}.$
I:3a.r1gz:]('):'c:~29.

‘<29?

3. Mun i 1m-tdai.ah_.

S/0 late §\1ad::ia1h,

Adult,

N().2.4/4, 43″: Cross,

Azacim,-1g;-:1′. Ch:;m1r2:jpet._ L” ‘
Bz1nga%:)1’e.~5(3{)(i) E. 8. .».”.>RESP(}E\’ ” _

{By Sri.Ram2:1c.hand1’a.RNaik, HCGP fo1′
S.ri.M.C.’Bz1$2m-:1′:-:_ju, Adv. fox’ R73) A 7

This Review Petitiptaa is fiIé:dwi;r1.d’€.1j O1’fiié1″v*1.7.F;uEe I of
CPC plzlying to rcvic3wQ__tf1;:e ()j.§d£3§.’,d£2I§i£1 “l.,4.20()9 passed in
VVl?bhx!2553f2008EU’fifi§(Rnni *5 LT* ‘}

This ReV\5?,cVv§I1iTF’e.:itiara i.:_0111in,gf§’__this uCc*3vu1it..«<;iz1teLi OE.O4.20()9 as to extending the

bezaéfit_0'f?gi'L:1,€ufly"for the break in service pe1'i0(i.

2'; _A3ccL)1"ding to the petiiionszr, respmadmt No.3 not

T fgral:L1ity for the bus:-:1k_ in servi11 of this Cour: E12155 alreaidjy’ been c(mfirmed

by the {)E»*é_si:>:2 }3c:z:<:h of this Court and as weE.i as by me: Apex

_, , Gk
C(}U£'i in {he -SLP filazd. Hezxce. the question of havmg 1'e._–_i0ok

'::g§i() the matter d{_)C.'§ 110% 2;1ri:~:r3.

4. Acc<':1'<;firagI§,-I, Review PeE'iiiv11 –_éi.Vi.§miSs'cci."'.

C<_)11sequentiy, M is<:.CvI.N0s<. 2 M) 2% /20'o9 ;m 178<*;2i2<T):)9 =fi1eV:i' _

for c(mdo11z:t'ion of delay andR"E3:) r' g1'£lfi'{"'-0f Si£1y ::21f(i also
dismissed.