2
4’3″ CROSS, HAL 2ND SFAGE
BANGALORE-560 O08
ACCUSES
ccc FELED UlS.11 85 12 OF’ THE c0NTE§?1.?5%V»”6eji?e..”vve
coum’ ACT PRAYING TO INITIATE c§;:~;’rE§1x:si>*1? ‘ =
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCL¥SE-D:~.,b”‘FOR
DISOBEYING THE ORDER i°AssEI:{ eye-me CITY:
JUDGE, BANGALORE, IN 0.s.No.31’4é:}:}8bA*r1§;:3.
BY ISSUENG AGAEN ONE M0R§:.._V$How ‘CAU-51:’ ?1§c,r_;’1VcE
DATED 26.5.03, HAVING KN0w*N..frH_E CGNSEQUENCES
OF’ SUCH VIOLATION 0§’:”T1_aE C}RDE.R_ {)F.f}’HE COURT.
This contempt pefi1:ie:§. pzel1’m1’nary
hearing this tiaya fOH£fif%h1g:~
This fiiafi-al1eeg’i::g'{:viI}fL11 disobedience to
the 0rdejf*_p£s$sed.: {if the Fri. City Civil and
Sessions .IVx1:c¥, g%cv, (Dist: Bangalore), in OS.
. ‘;5Jo.3,_1ée41 detee1.Qz..a5.2003.
” ‘ cemplam’ ant has got efiective remedy
eta fil-.=;’:3pf’;V1§c%;it”:io11 before the trial Court for disobcdifince of
‘A x V’ zhé fiifier and having regard to the facts of the case, we
this is not a fit case for exercising our power
T u uimder Sections 1 1 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act.
V42.