',CRIMINAL.:_ PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO. 801/2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 67" DAY OF AUGUST, 2009" BEFORE 1' N THE HON'BLE MRIUSTICE IAWAD % 3 ' CRIMINAL PETITION N:O:7S:2'I;;2«O»O'¥g_--.1: BETWEEN V' . t' " HARISHCHANDRA S/O GAN'A..PAYYA N'A.IK" -- AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS OCC:AGRICULTURIST,. " . " R/O MELI£\3A--IDAGUl\jlI'T * TQ:E-IONNAVAR " ._ I UTTARA KANNADATDISR 1 ...PETITIONER (BYSRI'Sl;JRES1?fi'S_4B::1'AT) 1 My V I . TA LU K' AGRICU L'|'JJRAE;; PRODUCE CO.OP.MARKETING ..S:OC1~ETY EIFDT HQNNAVAR BY ITS NISPAT é '*«::HI.--EI= SECRETARY I ,'~--II.C.,VHEOD£.,__R/O HONNAVAR. ...RESPONDENT
V.’_F.THIS»-..CRIf!¥IE\1AL PETITION IS FILED U/13.482 CR.P.C BY
THE ‘ADVOCEATAE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS
HON-‘.BLE_>CQ1JRT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ENTIRE
(My
’93
He submits that there is no proof regarding issuance of
cheque, date and liability and the allegations ma:’d–e”‘-i,n
the complaint are faise.
2. The grounds urged
necessarily has to be urged ljefore th.e’V’TriaicV’Cc:gu:rtV.m
now, the relief sought is to r;1,_i_.__i_a’sh the ,oro«ce_edvings. No
iliegality or improprietylisflpointecl –.t_he proceedings
before the Trial’ .c_our:j’t’V'”i’n::V;ta”l<i.§fi«g veovgnllizance for the
offence undei 'S«ecitvio_Vn"1-3:8?oft–he5,_:Negotiable instruments
Act a nd (W1 the .V3'C('ZUS'ed».-
3. iipetvétlioln oniy to be rejected, of
course ‘with th”e~..V_ob’servation that all that is urged here
“*__VaAn:d«–.:a_ray:: addjgit-i.onal defence to be urged, may be done
hefore’ HtiViAeg:., jurisdictional Magistrate and seek for
‘.clischa:g$e:,_ ‘V 4’
W
4. The petition stands disposed of in terms of the
above observation,
.s;a/Qtttjsy Q
vrp/–