High Court Kerala High Court

M.Vijayakumar vs N.P.Harris on 6 January, 2011

Kerala High Court
M.Vijayakumar vs N.P.Harris on 6 January, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1972 of 2010()


1. M.VIJAYAKUMAR,S/O.LATE BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. N.P.HARRIS, AGE & FATHERS NAME NOR
                       ...       Respondent

2. RIMNASH P.M., AGED NOT KNOWN

3. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.S.CHANDRASEKHARAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.M.JACOB MURICKAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :06/01/2011

 O R D E R
                M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
          = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
            M.A.C.A. NO. 1972 OF 2010
         = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
     Dated this the 6th day of January, 2011.

                 J U D G M E N T

This appeal is preferred against the award

of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,

Kozhikode in O.P.(MV)1031/07. The claimant, a

52 year old man employed in a Bank, sustained

injuries in a road accident and the Tribunal

awarded a compensation of Rs.16,750/-.

Dissatisfied with the same the claimant has come

up in appeal.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the

appellant as well as the insurance company. A

perusal of the award makes it very clear that he

had sustained a fracture on the zygomatic arch,

a fracture on the nasal spectrum and also

fracture on the lateral wall of both orbit. He

had been under the treatment of a Dental

M.A.C.A. 1972 OF 2010
-:2:-

College. So nature of injuries would establish

that the claimant had sustained facial injuries

and these injuries are capable of creating lot

of difficulties for the person at least

temporarily for a considerable length of time.

When there is a fracture on the zygomatic arch

even the intake of sold food becomes very

difficult and the fracture on the nasal bone can

cause problems even in proper breathing and the

fracture of the wall of the orbit can cause some

difficulties. So taking into consideration all

these aspects I feel this is a case where some

more amount has to be given towards nutritious

food as well as for loss of amenities and

enjoyment in life. I fix that amount at

Rs.7,000/- and award the same.

In the result the MACA is partly allowed

and the claimant is awarded an additional

M.A.C.A. 1972 OF 2010
-:3:-

compensation of Rs.7,000/- with 7% interest on

the said sum from the date of petition till

realisation and the insurance company is

directed to deposit the same within a period of

sixty days from the date of receipt of a copy of

the judgment.

Sd/-

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-

[true copy]

P.A. To Judge.